Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: valspar wb lacquer ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Northridge, CA.
    Posts
    132

    valspar wb lacquer ?

    Looking for a sprayable topcoat for cherry cabinets I'm starting now. I know target coatings has a good reputation, but has anyone have experience with enviro + wb "lacquer"? I can get it locally which is easier. I'm also looking for a red (?garnet) shellac as a seal coat, what local suppliers would sell this? I'm not terribly close to any rockler/woodcraft stores.
    thanks.
    Tim

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tomball, TX (30 miles NNW Houston)
    Posts
    2,747
    Water-borne "lacquer" is a marketing term it's an acrylic. Very high quality but acrylic just the same.

    Nothing lacquer about it.
    Scott

    Finishing is an 'Art & a Science'. Actually, it is a process. You must understand the properties and tendencies of the finish you are using. You must know the proper steps and techniques, then you must execute them properly.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,859
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Scott Holmes View Post
    Water-borne "lacquer" is a marketing term it's an acrylic. Very high quality but acrylic just the same.

    Nothing lacquer about it.
    True, but Target Coatings EM6000 was developed to mimic one of the most endearing qualities of solvent-based lacquers...burn-in. I'm not personally aware of any other water borne that does that, although I'm hardly an expert on what's out there.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tomball, TX (30 miles NNW Houston)
    Posts
    2,747
    Jim I'm going to expand on this, if you don’t mind... here's my thought process:

    It does adhere well, because the glycol ether in the new coat softens the previous coat and allows the new coat to coalesce with the old. No witness lines; which is a very good feature.

    This is not burn in; which I would describe as the solvent in the new coat dissolves the previous coat to made one coat, albeit thicker. e.g. Shellac and NC lacquer; the only two evaporative finishes.

    What do you think? Too picky?
    Scott

    Finishing is an 'Art & a Science'. Actually, it is a process. You must understand the properties and tendencies of the finish you are using. You must know the proper steps and techniques, then you must execute them properly.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    22,512
    Blog Entries
    1
    Tim, Rockler has free shipping through 8/23/09 so get whatever shellac you want. Use code V9783 when you order online to get the free shipping. I have no affiliation, I just watch for free shipping offers to pickup things that I would not normally pay the cost of shipping for . . . like shellac.

    As to "burn in"; all science aside, "burn in" is what Target calls that property on their site. I take that the same way I call a "tissue" a "Kleenex". I know what they mean ;-)
    "A hen is only an egg's way of making another egg".


    – Samuel Butler

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,859
    Scott, I don't inherently have a problem with your explanation, but to me "...the new coat softens the previous coat and allows the new coat to coalesce with the old" with previous coats doesn't sound a whole lot different to me than "...he new coat dissolves the previous coat to made one coat...", but I'm not a chemist nor do I play one on the Internet. Target, as Glenn mentions, promotes the property as "burn in" for EM6000 and it's predicessors, Oxford USL and Oxford PSL. Jeff Weiss specifically talked about it in that way with me at a trade show while back, too.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Allen, TX
    Posts
    2,017
    also tim, i would not use garnet shellac as a sealer. it's not a little red, it's a lot red. it can have the same result as a stain over a non-sealed board... splotchy absorption.

    amber is light enough to be used as a sealer and will give it a bit of reddish brown in the seal coat, so i'd go that route instead. if you want the color of garnet that's fine, but use a clear seal coat and then put the garnet coats down after until you get the red hue you're shooting for. the first few coats will be orange-ish. the next few will start to develop a reddish brown, if you put more than 6 or 7 you'll get that deep red associated with 'cherry' finishes.

    edit: i previously posted some thing in the projects forum finished with garnet, here's what 4-5 coats of garnet sprayed over cypress looks like, with an amber seal coat underneath...

    http://www.sawmillcreek.org/showthread.php?t=105726

    your cherry being darker to start with, the result would be darker too.
    Last edited by Neal Clayton; 08-18-2009 at 3:05 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Northridge, CA.
    Posts
    132
    thanks for the help. I think I've settled for a BLO coat, followed by 2 Zinnser Sealcoat. If after this I need more red, was thinking of using transtint dye in the first coat or tow of my topcoat.

    So my original question; sounds like no one has used or heard about the Valspar water based clear top coat (Enviro +)??

    Any suggestions for the transtint color?
    Tim

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •