Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 48 of 48

Thread: From Scary Sharp to Norton Waterstones?

  1. #46
    Please let me know how it goes for you. I am trying to make the same decision. Scary sharp is working ok, but the paper just does not last long and I am getting some inconsistent results. May just be me, or I may be using the paper too long.

    Thanks!

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Posts
    6,224
    Bob, I am very happy with the Shapton Stones. I have no reference to compare with Nortons, but I am getting miles better results than with scary sharp. Way faster and I don't introduce as many mistakes.
    Veni Vidi Vendi Vente! I came, I saw, I bought a large coffee!

  3. #48
    Brian, I'll also add to the vote for a large DMT coarse stone for flattening your nice water stones, and the backs of blades that need a lot of work.

    I'm still getting by with some older water stones, and reliable stone flattening and the coarse work on the DMT has made that possible.

    The nicer water stones such as yours are very tempting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •