Originally Posted by
Matt Clara
I know RhinoCam is supposed to be pretty good, and as i recall it costs about the same, but that's on top of the cost of Rhino 3D itself.
3D Nurbs based modeling is a whole new ball game. Parametric based 3D modeling as well is more challenging than 2D cad. Both have there advantages, and you can easily end up on a slippery slope of software/plug ins to put together a tool kit.
Rhino Cam is essentially an integrated version of Visual Mill from my understanding. Visual Mills most notable advantage over Aspires CAM components would be that with Visual mill combined with the necessary modules would allow you to create toolpaths in true 3D for a 4th axis.
I am sure there are other advantages of visual mill as well that somebody with experience could note.
Aspire is a very affordable option for strict 3 axis work and if you do have an indexer (4th axis), current versions of Aspire and V-Carve pro will let you wrap a file around a cylinder. This is not the same however as 3 dimensional machining on a fourth axis. Take a look at Guy Matthew's work to see some examples of 3 dimensional work on an indexer.
Art Cam seems to be popular and from my understanding it is of a similar nature to Aspire. However Art Cam is pricy to say the least. I can't say much about it but maybe somebody else will.
V-Carve Pro aka Partworks is cheap, easy to learn, and quite capable within the realm of 2.5d work. Part of the reason I have not bought Aspire yet is I have been able to accomplish every job I have had so far with V-Carve Pro. I believe you get a discount if you decide to purchase Aspire later on.
On the flip side if your looking for a 3D based NURBS modeling program on the cheap, check out Blender which is free.
I realize this is a bit of a tangent so I am sorry if this is a bit off from the original topic of the thread.
Hardware - Shopbot PRSstandard 48x96 with PC router.
Software - Aspire 2.5, Partworks, Cut 3D, Photo V-Carve
Open Source/Free - Inkscape, Open Office.