Originally Posted by
Brian J. Williams
The key thing in concrete longevity (and quality) is the water/cement ratio, which is the weight of water to the weight of cement in the concrete. Most thin-slab concrete issues arise out of an excess water/cement ratio - say over 0.55- where the rule is the higher the water/cement ratio, the greater the shrinkage (and associated cracking). (We often specify concrete mixes for drilled shafts or other below-water applications where the water/cement ratio is limited to 0.4 or less.) Most of the cracking folks see at the top of a "normal" concrete slab (absent other issues such as insufficient subgrade preparation) is from the concrete being over-finished (which brings water to the slab surface) or the "old-time" finisher who figures he needs to add a half gallon or so just to make finishing easier- both cases wil increase the water/cement ratio and then cause the concrete to shrinkage crack as the concrete cures and the excess water bleeds from the concrete. Simply put, if you want to trash a slab, the easiest way is to add more water at the site. There are a lot of specialty chemicals that can be added to concrete to increase its workability without screwing with the water, but most small foundation contractors don't know what they are or don't understand how to use them. I am currently working on a dam project where the original construction included a water/cement ratio over 1.0, and the structure is severely cracked and about to be taken out of service long before it should have been.
With regard to the use of welded wire reinforcement versus the use of fiber reinforcement, it really depends on the application, but the proper use of fibers (the right fiber type and quantity) will almosrt always yield better crack resistance results than small-gauge wire mesh, for a number of reasons (and I'll limit my discussion here to concrete that is not otherwise reinforced). One drawback in the use of wire mesh, as pointed out above, is that wire mesh is rarely well placed within the slab, and unfortunately, it often ends up at the base of the slab where it is of no use to slab reinforcement or reduction in cracking. Even when properly placed, mesh does not provide as much tensile strength as a properly designed mesh additive. The one drawback of mesh is (as was also pointed out above) is that it can leave a slightly fuzzy apperarance, and it can be more diofficult to finish than a conventional concrete without mesh. The other issue, too, is that mesh can cost a fair bit more than wire mesh, but again, it depends on what kind of performance you want out of your slab and how much you want to spend.
FWIW, my background includes evaluation, specification, and construction observation of concrete materials on projects rnaging from deep drilled shafts to nuclear facilities. My 2 cents.
Brian Williams, PE, PG