Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: What is "Ol' Arn"?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Toronto Ontario
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Boyd View Post
    My definition is anything that was made before me(1975), made in North America, and weighs more than me.

    Rob who is the current caretaker of a 36" & 26" Silver band saws, two 50's Delta HD shapers, Delta unisaw, two Walker Turner talble saws(cast iron and stamped steel body) and plenty of other hefty items.
    Why limit yourself to NA machines?

    Regards, Rod.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Central WI
    Posts
    2,416
    Mark, I tend to agree on the shaper thing. They were solid but not very user friendly in comparison to the newer Euro ones. Usually had a poor fence and odd sized spindles. On the other hand $1000 buys a machine that with a feeder could run stuff all day. It is the set up that is the killer there. As to the jointer, I'd only trade my Porter for a Martin- of course there are no takers. Dave

  3. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Ashmeade View Post
    I think it's simply a matter of being old and made of iron. Nothing more needs to be read into it.
    That about sums it up for me, also. I have an old delta "school" lathe, two delta HD "prison shapers", and a Bridgewood, made by maggi, "ex harley davidson factory" radial arm saw; all old, and all with some iron, and I like that each has some interesting history. The radial arm saw was made in Italy, and I think that they made some arn also. Look at the old martin machines, they definitely have some iron in them.
    Last edited by Stephen Cherry; 02-06-2013 at 12:44 PM. Reason: spellin

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Romeo, MI
    Posts
    163
    One of the reasons new-ish machines end up in landfills is the use of unique parts, castings etc (including plastics), electronics and no factory support. The old stuff often used commonly-available parts or parts that can be rebuilt. It sucks to call the mfr. for a replacement toothed rack, spindle, or what-not & be told there are no parts available.

  5. Quote Originally Posted by Rich Riddle View Post
    To me old iron predates the 1980's at a minimum. On a different note, I thought all new table saws, including the Unisaw, came standard with riving knives.
    As far as I can tell everything made since 2008 must have a riving knife as that is part of the latest UL tablesaw spec (UL 987.)

    Defining old iron is pretty subjective, "I'll know it when I see it." Generally some huge piece of very heavy iron and steel industrial equipment from about the 1930s to the 1960s comes to mind. There must be a lack of anything "modern" such as much in the way of safety features and plastics or electronics. Flourishes in the castings, American manufacture, obsolete technology like babbitt bearings, and the white/cream, dove gray, or turquoise green paint colors are added pluses.

  6. #21
    I consider the line to be the 1960s since that seems to be when Mechanite starts to disappear in the manufacture of woodworking machines and be reserved for metalworking . I started working about 1966 ,all of the old heavy duty saws had riving knives. Babbitt is not obsolete. When it is obsolete you might not have current for your shop since it is still used in power generation .

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    N.E. Ohio
    Posts
    3,164
    What is "Ol' Arn"?
    How would you define old iron?
    It's in the same class as unicorns, UFOs, bigfoot, the Dodo and passenger pidgeons...
    People say they find it - but - close scrutiny of all offerings on CL reveal nothing but "vintage"....

    "Vintage" can best be described as something broken, filthy and of an unknown age that's priced at least twice what a new item costs.

    There have been some sightings of a sub species of Arn - Walker Turner Drill Presses - however so far these sightings have been unconfirmed.
    try to remember that the very first step in finishing a project is choosing the material. You want to select wood that has the color and grain pattern than best suits your requirements as "covering up" those things after the fact makes your work much, much harder - Jim Becker

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Western PA
    Posts
    7,420
    Quote Originally Posted by Ole Anderson View Post
    Hey, keep my brother out of this!
    I figured someone would have to get that joke, even if a lot of people didn't. Ole, every time you post, I hear Ole and Arn Anderson interviews inside my head!
    End grain should never be shown in polite company.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Martintown, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by johnny means View Post
    How would you define old iron? For example, I myself wouldn't consider any Unisaw as old iron because the design and build quality is pretty much the same as contemporary machines. Yet, I would consider an American slider from the same era Old Arn because of the outdated design and functionality.
    Hi,

    I am new to SMC but have been browsing treads for about a year now.

    I personally define "old arn" as Tannewitz, Northfield, Oliver, Yates, Wadkin, etc. These companies made (Northfield still makes) machines that were basically bomb-proof, and once you made some tune-up, it held for years. I am planing to someday aquire a used Northfield 18" or 25" planer, because all the parts are still available from them.

    My 2 cents,
    Igor.

  10. #25
    There can be a an overly sentimental view of old machines,but there is also overly enthusiastic embrace of the new. We have TWO members here ,both engineers ,struggling to adjust and fix new jointers. Old iron left the factory adjusted and ready to use . Not with manuals with adjustment tips.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Central WI
    Posts
    2,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Mel Fulks View Post
    There can be a an overly sentimental view of old machines,but there is also overly enthusiastic embrace of the new. We have TWO members here ,both engineers ,struggling to adjust and fix new jointers. Old iron left the factory adjusted and ready to use . Not with manuals with adjustment tips.
    Agreed. If there is one machine where old shines vs new it would be the jointer. No magic improvements due to technology. It's all about integrity and planing of the cast iron and the quality of the cutterhead. Dave

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Toronto Ontario
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by David Kumm View Post
    Agreed. If there is one machine where old shines vs new it would be the jointer. No magic improvements due to technology. It's all about integrity and planing of the cast iron and the quality of the cutterhead. Dave
    That's very true, however the old machines aren't always as good as the new machines.

    I gave up a General jointer for a Hammer J/P. The Hammer has a better designed cutterhead that produces a better finish than the General did..........Rod.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Central WI
    Posts
    2,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Rod Sheridan View Post
    That's very true, however the old machines aren't always as good as the new machines.

    I gave up a General jointer for a Hammer J/P. The Hammer has a better designed cutterhead that produces a better finish than the General did..........Rod.
    The Felder Silent Power head has no equal in my world. To me a jointer is more about flat and having the ability to handle boards i can barely lift than cut quality. The old General was pretty stout and likely to remain so forever while the Hammer will have a different life span. I'm a huge hammer fan though. Dave

  14. I still think it's just a matter of old and made of iron. For every machine made in the early part of the 20th century that turned into a classic, there must be several that didn't. I think there are at least three categories:

    a) Machines that are the equal or better in every respect to current machines. Eg Some old, big, jointers, high quality Radial Arm Saws
    b) Machines that simply weren't that good in the first place, but are old. Eg Delta Homecraft shapers, 3-speed drill presses with two-spoke handles and square head jointers.
    c) Machines that were good in their day, but aren't as good as the modern crop. Eg most straight blade planers, and pretty much every table saw will fall into this category.

    Not all that is old is equal, and certainly not all that is new. So as I say, the term means it's old and made of iron to me. No other inference.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Central WI
    Posts
    2,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Ashmeade View Post
    I still think it's just a matter of old and made of iron. For every machine made in the early part of the 20th century that turned into a classic, there must be several that didn't. I think there are at least three categories:

    a) Machines that are the equal or better in every respect to current machines. Eg Some old, big, jointers, high quality Radial Arm Saws
    b) Machines that simply weren't that good in the first place, but are old. Eg Delta Homecraft shapers, 3-speed drill presses with two-spoke handles and square head jointers.
    c) Machines that were good in their day, but aren't as good as the modern crop. Eg most straight blade planers, and pretty much every table saw will fall into this category.

    Not all that is old is equal, and certainly not all that is new. So as I say, the term means it's old and made of iron to me. No other inference.
    Mark, I'd disagree with the last statement. Planers themselves are lower quality but the spiral head leaves a better finish. doesn't mean the planer will last like the old. A straight knife head in an old cast iron planer in the hands of someone who knows how to sharpen and even a good tersa head will give as good a finish as the spiral. It is the machine and the operator who have gone downhill. Same with tablesaws. Safety has gone way up and that is a big deal but the old saws were WAY better built- at least in the Oliver, Tanny yates, Greenlee levels. Martin is the only real comparable in build quality left. Not because older is better, just that cost is so high now to replicate that build. Dave

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •