Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: To spring or not...M12V

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Livermore CA
    Posts
    170

    To spring or not...M12V

    I have an Hitachi M12V which I use both free-hand and on my router table. The questions are: What are the advantages/disadvantages of removing the plunge springs, and if the +'s out weigh the -'s, how does one do that?

    As I crank the know to raise and lower the router in the table, I am working against the springs, but I don't want to make a mistake by just ripping them out.

    Any and all advice is welcome...

    Thanks,
    Warren

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    2,296
    If you are using it as a "plunge" router you will need to keep the springs in. I have the springs out, but I only use it in my router table. I have heard of some people removing one of the springs, but I think you should keep both springs in until you decide that the best thing to do is have TWO routers

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portsmouth, VA
    Posts
    1,218
    Warren, here is a link to woodshopdemos and the preparations he made for using the M12V. I also did the same thing when I bought one earlier this year and must say that the modifications have been an improvement. Of course, this all goes without saying that the router can only be used in a table afterwards.

    Hope this helps: http://www.woodshopdemos.com/smfld-3.htm

    Be well,

    Doc

  4. #4
    The woodshopdemo also removes the ears on the router.

    The "ears" do not need to be removed from the M12V in order to use panel raising bits, as the demo suggests. Although it appears that it would be a lot easier to change bits without those ears, I have raised many panels using that router in a home-made table without removing the ears. Once the ears are gone, they cannot be replaced, and you cannot use the router with a guide bushing.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Boynton Beach FL
    Posts
    97
    The major reason for removing the ears is to be able to use a bent wrench from above the table to loosen and tighten bits. This is a Marc Sommerfeld idea (he swears by the M12V -- it's the only router for him until something better comes along). I did it and the convenience of having the bit changes above the table is not to be scoffed at. I have this router dedicated to table use.

    There are aftermarket kits for using inserts. So this isn't a concern.

    I didn't remove the springs. I installed a RouterRaizer to be able to adjust the bit hieght / depth from above the table. The Router Raizer people recommended leaving the springs in the router and it really is a big improvement to how the whole package works.

    If I need another router for handheld, I will get another M12V, install the RouterRaizer and otherwise leave it alone.

    Steve.

  6. #6
    I cut the ears of on mine, and purchased a 2nd base to use for plunge routing.
    Scott

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Southern MD
    Posts
    1,932
    I removed ears and springs. But, mine is dedicated to the table. Springs are easy enough to remove and replace. So, try it both ways.

    Jay
    Jay St. Peter

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Livermore CA
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by Tim Morton
    If you are using it as a "plunge" router you will need to keep the springs in. I have the springs out, but I only use it in my router table. I have heard of some people removing one of the springs, but I think you should keep both springs in until you decide that the best thing to do is have TWO routers
    Thanks Tim. That is what I suspected. I do have more than one router, but since this is the only one with soft start and variable speed, I prefer it. So, I need to use it both ways.

    Warren

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Livermore CA
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Abele
    Warren, here is a link to woodshopdemos and the preparations he made for using the M12V. I also did the same thing when I bought one earlier this year and must say that the modifications have been an improvement. Of course, this all goes without saying that the router can only be used in a table afterwards.

    Hope this helps: http://www.woodshopdemos.com/smfld-3.htm

    Be well,

    Doc
    Doc,
    I reviewed the link, and I was amazed at the courage it must take to take a saw to the base of the router! I really liked the extension he put on for the collet lock.

    Since I will be using this both ways, I don't believe I will cut the ears off. I really like being able to use it with them on. I have used a raised panel cutter with them on, and it is my largest bit thus far.

    Thanks for the link, Doc. It was very interesting.

    Warren

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Livermore CA
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie Plesums
    The woodshopdemo also removes the ears on the router.

    The "ears" do not need to be removed from the M12V in order to use panel raising bits, as the demo suggests. Although it appears that it would be a lot easier to change bits without those ears, I have raised many panels using that router in a home-made table without removing the ears. Once the ears are gone, they cannot be replaced, and you cannot use the router with a guide bushing.
    \

    Charlie,
    I too have used my panel raising bits without removing the "ears" and it worked just fine. I certainly have whacked my fingers a number of times trying to loosen the collet from under the table, so I bought a bent wrench which makes the job easier.

    Thanks for the reply. I appreciate it.

    Warren

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Livermore CA
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by Steven Herbin
    The major reason for removing the ears is to be able to use a bent wrench from above the table to loosen and tighten bits. This is a Marc Sommerfeld idea (he swears by the M12V -- it's the only router for him until something better comes along). I did it and the convenience of having the bit changes above the table is not to be scoffed at. I have this router dedicated to table use.

    There are aftermarket kits for using inserts. So this isn't a concern.

    I didn't remove the springs. I installed a RouterRaizer to be able to adjust the bit hieght / depth from above the table. The Router Raizer people recommended leaving the springs in the router and it really is a big improvement to how the whole package works.

    If I need another router for handheld, I will get another M12V, install the RouterRaizer and otherwise leave it alone.

    Steve.
    Hi Steve,
    My budget won't allow for another M12V, although that would be nice. The adjustment on the M12V works well under the table, but it is a bit tedious. An above the table raising device of some sort would be great, but again, the old budget kicks in.

    I did buy a bent wrench at the last wood show, and if you move the router most of the way up, it works just fine. I may trim it a bit and see if it would make it more useful, but it has already saved me many an under the table pinched knuckle .

    Thanks for the help!
    Warren

  12. #12
    The 12MV is a great table router in my opinion. I removed the ears and just recently the springs. I use a raising device from woodpeckers.com and I love my set up. The next change in this area is to build a router table wing for my TS and have the router mounted there. That is needed to make room for the new Performax 10-20 sander I ordered (pre gloat)

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Livermore CA
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Loven
    I cut the ears of on mine, and purchased a 2nd base to use for plunge routing.
    Scott
    Thanks for your input, Scott. I appreciate all who took the time to respond.

    Warren

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Livermore CA
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by JayStPeter
    I removed ears and springs. But, mine is dedicated to the table. Springs are easy enough to remove and replace. So, try it both ways.

    Jay
    Jay,
    Since mine is used both ways, and as a plunge router freehand, I guess I will just leave it as is. I do appreciate your comments.

    This is really a great place to learn! Thanks to all who have helped me.

    Warren

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Livermore CA
    Posts
    170
    )%???ohn Gregory]The 12MV is a great table router in my opinion. I removed the ears and just recently the springs. I use a raising device from woodpeckers.com and I love my set up. The next change in this area is to build a router table wing for my TS and have the router mounted there. That is needed to make room for the new Performax 10-20 sander I ordered (pre gloat)[/QUOTE]

    Hi John,
    It sounds like you are room-challenged like I am!! I bought a Bench Dog router table insert for my table saw and really like it. I recently purchased a Performax 22-44 and have enoyed using it. Great sander, and very useful.

    Good luck on building your own wing. I certainly like mine, and I am sure you will not only enjoy the fruits of your labor, but building it as well!

    Best wishes,
    Warren

Similar Threads

  1. Spring Shop Improvement Projects?
    By Jim Becker in forum General Woodworking and Power Tools
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 04-12-2005, 7:14 PM
  2. Spring has spring?
    By Bruce Page in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-10-2005, 7:48 PM
  3. A M12v problem
    By Dan McLaughlin in forum General Woodworking and Power Tools
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-03-2003, 6:36 PM
  4. For those with a Hitchi M12V in a table
    By Dan McLaughlin in forum General Woodworking and Power Tools
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-30-2003, 9:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •