Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Dust Collector vs. Cyclone

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Reno, Nevada
    Posts
    59

    Dust Collector vs. Cyclone

    Getting curious about the value of a cyclone vs. a bag dust collector. I currently have a 1.5hp Shop Fox Dust collector in my shop. I have built in pipe to the lathe station and am planning to modify the piping to have solid metal or PVC pipe to improve effeciancy. Multiple ports to shorten the flex hose runs to the machines. The TS, Jointer, Shaper, Bandsaw, and planer are all mobile. I am also planning to change the way the collection is at the lathe station to improve chip collection. Do the cyclones have more collection power than a similar hp CFM bag system? how are they on noise? In short guys whats the difference?
    Let the wood speak!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    519
    Cyclones have several advantages over bags. One, the filter media is usually much finer than any bag. This means that the air returned to the shop is cleaner than the air from a bag unit. It is the most harmful size particles that are better removed by a cyclone. While a bag system with clean bags may equal a cyclone in suction, as the bags get clogged (and they will very quickly) the resistance will create a back pressure in the system which prevents the bag system from performing to its' peak. So, in essence, a cyclone has more suction. In addition, since the large chunks are removed before the air gets to the filter, the filter stays cleaner much, much, longer than with a bag system. I have taken numerous cans of waste from the bottom of my cyclone and have had no need to clean the filter. With my old Jet bag system the inside of the closet where it resided was caked with dust. With my Woodsucker cyclone there is none. It is well worth the upgrade.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Peshtigo, WI (~50 miles N of Green Bay)
    Posts
    1,403

    Dust Collector vs Cyclone

    Chuck,
    From a purely engineering standpoint, a "cyclone" is the LEAST efficient way of removing dust from a "dirty" air flow media. A bag collector is far better and a "scrubber" is better yet.

    A "cyclone" depends on cyclonic (spinning) flow to separate the "coarse" materials from the "fines" as a result of centrifugal forces. The "fines" are NOT subject to these forces and, therefore, must be handled elsewhere such as in a filter or being exhausted to the atmosphere. A bag collector filters to the micron level for which it is designed. As the bag becomes clogged, the efficiency of the overall system decreases but the micron size of the collected material decreases (ie. gets better).

    With that said, the WWing suppliers who are heralding "cyclones" are, in fact, selling first stage cyclones and second stage bag (filter) collectors. They have an excellent product but they are "technically challenged" in terms of marketing.

    I've got a bag collector in my shop. However, if I had the need, I would not hesitate to "upgrade" to a cyclone ---- assuming the micron ratings of the filter were superior to my bag.

    I'm confused? Is a "cyclone" a tornado, a hurricane or just a revolving atmospheric phenomenon? DAH???? Youse guys make yer own decisions!

    Dale T.
    I am so busy REMAKING my projects that I don't have time to make them the FIRST time!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    519
    A tornado is a "...a violently whirling column of air extending downward from a cumlonimbus cloud...". A cyclone is "...a storm with strong winds rotating about a moving center of low pressure.". And a hurricane is "...a violent tropical cyclone with winds moving at 73 or more miles an hour...and originating usually in the West Indian region..". At least that's what my Websters tells me. Anyway, all I know is that my Woodsucker works much better than my Jet DC-1200. BTW you're welcome Dale.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    La Habra Hts., CA
    Posts
    702
    Dale, he cheated-- he looked it up!
    Jerry

  6. #6
    I don't profess to be an expert on dust collection, I simply know what I have experienced in my own shop. I started with a shop vac years ago, bought a dust collector when they first came on the market, wasn't impressed with the fine dust, upgranded the bags, then upgraded to a 2 h.p. unit, upgraded the bags and have now upgraded to a cyclone. Below is a page with an overview.

    http://www.picframer.ca/cyclone.htm

    The biggest difference I have seen is the cyclone seperates most of the dust from the air, meaning the air going to the filter takes a lot longer to load the filter before I had to clean it in order to maintain a required CFM. With the 2 h.p. unit, I had to clean out the upper bag once, sometimes twice a week to maintain a decent CFM at the tools, if my son was turning during this period, I would have to clean it almost daily...in short it was a pain and cleaning these filters is not a realy healthy idea as dust goes everywhere even when done outside which I always did and it's super fine.

    I cleaned the filter in the cyclone after 6 or 8 drums of dust collectoin and received less than a teaspoon, I was pretty impressed.

    I have now emptied well over 50 drums of dust from the drum and have not touched the filter as the CFM at the tools is still very, very high. My son has spent at least 60 hours at the lathe sanding which would have killed the bag unit with loading.

    So in short, in my experience, it's simply more efficient and the air quality in the shop is night and day as I leave the cyclone running most of the time as it's no lounder than a tablesaw, perhaps less.

    Andy

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sterling CT
    Posts
    2,474
    I agree with andy
    here is my two cents worth


    1. cyclones offer another some advantages for some installations and some types of shops. I have had both bag and cyclone systems and like the cyclone way over the bag only system.
    If you are really producing a lot of chips from planning opperations then the cyclone is really nice because of the large collection possibility. I use a 55 gal drum and there have been times when I have emptied it at least 3 times per day.
    2. My system is two part with the cyclone on the outside of the shop and the return air and filter media inside. I find it much easier and a lot less messy to empty the chip drum outside rather than inside my shop, especially when I am running my wide belt sander a lot.
    3. I also like the split system because I don't take up valuable shop space with the cyclone and dust barrel inside, that would be hard with the bag system.

    lou

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colfax, Iowa
    Posts
    126

    Since I have no experience with either,

    I have considered both, and find myself in a quandry.

    It seems to me that if the purpose is to stop fine dust you can inhale, emptying bags would put you directly in the stream for inhaling the fine dust you are trying to elminate.

    I am convinced that the cyclone is the way to go, however, I like the canister machines that deposit the dust and chips in a plastic bag you can seal and dispose of.

    It seems to me that ideal would be a hybird system that combines features of the cyclone. canister & bag would be safest and most efficent?

    I am not sure any hobbiest directed system is built that does all this?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    West of Ft. Worth, TX
    Posts
    5,815
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Dannels
    I have considered both, and find myself in a quandry.


    It seems to me that ideal would be a hybird system that combines features of the cyclone. canister & bag would be safest and most efficent?

    I am not sure any hobbiest directed system is built that does all this?
    Does anyone know if there is a way to line the chip barrell with a plastic bag so that one could pull it out of the barrell after tying it off to keep the dust level down? Jim.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    71
    Oneida just came out with this. I don't know how well it works, but it sounds good.

    http://synergy.oneida-air.com/public...B25E4CDEEEE%7D

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Dannels
    I have considered both, and find myself in a quandry.

    _snip_
    It seems to me that ideal would be a hybird system that combines features of the cyclone. canister & bag would be safest and most efficent?

    I am not sure any hobbiest directed system is built that does all this?
    If you use a good N95 dust mask, that takes care of the 'health' aspects no matter what chip/dust collection system you use and how/where you empty/clean the collection bag/bin.

    A mask plus any or no DC is also far less costly than a maskless system as far as I have experienced with my bag collector. Most masks are close to useless, but a good face seal and exhaust/exhale ports make it far more tollerable

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,827
    I would only consider using the Synergy bag system if I was largely collecting fine dust from sanders and small tools. I compost the chips and dust as it is, so I just put the barrel in my tractor's loader and cart it accross the property. Very little dust is stirred up when I'm moving the barrel out of the DC closet to it's waiting transport...
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sterling CT
    Posts
    2,474
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Becker
    I would only consider using the Synergy bag system if I was largely collecting fine dust from sanders and small tools. I compost the chips and dust as it is, so I just put the barrel in my tractor's loader and cart it accross the property. Very little dust is stirred up when I'm moving the barrel out of the DC closet to it's waiting transport...
    That is a nice way to do it, and I agree that the dust is kept to a minimum. If you have to put it into bags to take to the dump and road side PU then you do have a mess on your hands.

    lou

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Peshtigo, WI (~50 miles N of Green Bay)
    Posts
    1,403

    Redemption!

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Cox
    A tornado is a "...a violently whirling column of air extending downward from a cumlonimbus cloud...". A cyclone is "...a storm with strong winds rotating about a moving center of low pressure.". And a hurricane is "...a violent tropical cyclone with winds moving at 73 or more miles an hour...and originating usually in the West Indian region..". At least that's what my Websters tells me. Anyway, all I know is that my Woodsucker works much better than my Jet DC-1200. BTW you're welcome Dale.
    Thanks Steve,
    Your definitions tell me that a tornado, twister, etc., and a hurricane are all cyclones.

    My point was that the marketers of the "cyclones" in our WWing world are technically underselling their excellent products from a purely engineering standpoint.

    By the way, I envy you guys who empty your "systems" on a daily or even a weekly basis. I empty mine about every three months. That's because 90% of my shop time is spent in the "Emergency Room" of our local hospital. It's a GREAT way to meet pretty young nurses but they are all looking for rich guys who are under ninety years old. OK - two strikes and I'm OUT!!

    Dale T.
    I am so busy REMAKING my projects that I don't have time to make them the FIRST time!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    San Jose, Middle California
    Posts
    636
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim O'Dell
    Does anyone know if there is a way to line the chip barrell with a plastic bag so that one could pull it out of the barrell after tying it off to keep the dust level down? Jim.
    I have heard of people finding wire style baskets that will fit somewhat tightly into the drum to hold contractor type bags from flying back into the cyclone for the dust. I'll be trying this as I have a big milling job coming up and I foresee many drums full of dust/chips.
    Michael in San Jose
    Non confundar in aeternam

Similar Threads

  1. Does Oneida have something to fear from Grizzly?
    By Frank Pellow in forum General Woodworking and Power Tools
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 10-28-2005, 9:10 PM
  2. Grizzly Cyclone Dust Collector(s)
    By mike malone in forum General Woodworking and Power Tools
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-05-2005, 1:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •