Dave,
I will caution everybody that politics, even international politics are not a subject allowed at SMC.
That being said, I find it difficult to believe that governments are preventing the research and development of LFTRs just to continue making nuclear bomb materials. In as much as only a couple bombs have ever been used, I doubt there is a shortage of materials.
Since the politics of storing spent rods is so sensitive, I can't imagine that governments wouldn't be encouraging research along the lines of LFTRs.
What are the drawbacks LFTRs? There has to be drawbacks.
Is the LFTR technology as economical as the current technology?
What percentage of your collueges agree with your opinion?
I bring this up only because it's also important for people to realize that even among scientists and engineers, there are often strong disagreements about different technologies. For example, I was shocked to learn not too long ago, that physicists are still arguing what the field strength of the earth's magnetic field is.
I can't imagine the whole scientific community would not be causing a major uproar if LFTR technology is totally superior to the technology currently being used.
It's my nature to want to believe in the overall good nature of mankind.
Ken
So much to learn, so little time.....