Dan,
A few more thoughts on Henri's comment about trying to reduce your mistake rate? Obviously proofing on any hand drawn paper copy is the first place to start. Then proof the computer file before doing your output. Sometimes allowing some time between finishing the computer file and proofing it can help you spot problems better.
For myself, there are some things that I see immediately on a computer screen and some I don't. For example, something in my mind prevents me from seeing that Recieve is spelled wrong if I see it on a computer screen, but if it is printed on paper I see it right away. Other words are just the opposite. I see the typo on screen like a bright flashing light, but on paper???? Nope! I can KNOW that I did it wrong and look right at it and not see it. Go figure.
So for important things I have a macro done up that takes all my common typos and misspellings and looks for them and replaces them throughout a file or document. This is in addition to any spell check or grammar check. That has helped me a lot.
And of course, you can always run the final draft by the buyer for a last check of content. It is possible they gave you the wrong details and this is their chance to catch it.
And for a graphic that is bound for the laser....make a check list of things to do on each file to check for duplicate layers, spotting multiple lines that are hidden, etc. Get anal if you will pardon the phrase, and make yourself go through that list each and every file before it heads to the laser.
I will often print a draft on paper and go through it before the final output. In the case of a laser, you might burn it to a cheap material as a test run to be sure of the output, though that doesnt help with the settings you need for the final material.
And since you will still have bad runs, save the material and use small portions of it to run a fast test of the settings you will use on your full run. May as well get some use out of it as a test material to be certain you have covered all your bases.
That seems like a lot to do, but if you find your costs for shot materials is getting unreasonable the cost of doing this level of QC may not be too bad in the long run. And you will get quicker at it if you have a firm process in place to follow.
Dave
he who has so many typos in his forum posts he spends more time in Edit than doing the original post. Sigh. <grin>
900x600 80watt EFR Tube laser from Liaocheng Ray Fine Tech LTD. Also a 900x600 2.5kw spindle CNC from Ray Fine. And my main tool, a well used and loved Jet 1642 Woodlathe with an outboard toolrest that helps me work from 36 inch diameters down to reallllllly tiny stuff.