Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Help Effectively Routing a "simple" 3D Shape

  1. #1

    Help Effectively Routing a "simple" 3D Shape

    I don't do any work in 3D but I was contacted today about doing something and it looked simple enough so I figured I'd work on it a bit.

    The goal is to route the following two files out of black walnut lumber. I ran it through Aspire and the roughing pass and finishing pass come up between 6-7 hours per arm. The roughing pass is with a regular end mill and the finishing pass with a 1/8" ball end mill. My guess is there has to be a more efficient way to route something like this.

    Any tips or suggestions on how to attack this project efficiently yet still produce a quality product?

    3D arms.zip
    Equipment: IS400, IS6000, VLS 6.60, LS100, HP4550, Ricoh GX e3300n, Hotronix STX20
    Software: Adobe Suite & Gravostyle 5
    Business: Trophy, Awards and Engraving

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    In the foothills of the Sandia Mountains
    Posts
    16,644
    Post the crv3d file.
    Please help support the Creek.


    "It's paradoxical that the idea of living a long life appeals to everyone, but the idea of getting old doesn't appeal to anyone."
    Andy Rooney



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Murfreesboro, TN.
    Posts
    212
    Ross,

    These two parts should be done in less than 1 hour.... just played with what you had.....If we were actually doing the file we'd bring the parts closer together. We'd probably do one more final pencil pass with a 1/8" bit on the tapered seams but you should get the picture.....think our file says something like 36 minutes...... as is....

    Rough pass was 25% step over and 275 speed = 1/2" end mill

    Final pass was 10% step over and 275 speed= 1/2" end mill

    You probably may want to do a profile cut out but maybe not.....

    Blessings,

    Kevin

    Arms Left & Right.jpgRough Pass.jpgFinish Pass.jpg
    Last edited by Kevin L. Waldron; 07-28-2014 at 4:26 PM.

  4. #4
    I'll post the file tomorrow. Sorry. I figured a STL would be a bit more versatile and that's what the customer provided as well.

    Kevin: What kind of machine do you have? Would you do this all with a 1/2" ball nose end mill? What kind of depth per pass do you do?
    Equipment: IS400, IS6000, VLS 6.60, LS100, HP4550, Ricoh GX e3300n, Hotronix STX20
    Software: Adobe Suite & Gravostyle 5
    Business: Trophy, Awards and Engraving

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Murfreesboro, TN.
    Posts
    212
    Ross,

    Our files default to 1/8" cuts....... with 1/2" end mills...... sorry, and I didn't change the default. We have a Techno Premium.... 12' x 5' x 19" z.... ( Our software of choice is Rhinoceros and Rhinocam and/or Madcam for 3D work normally....... 2.5 work we would probably use Aspire )

    I don't see a reason to use a ball nose on straight cuts or leveling.... Parts like shown below yes, a ball nose would be necessary but not for what you show.

    Blessings,

    Kevin
    Maloof Style Seat.jpg

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Leland, NC
    Posts
    476
    From what I can see of your model there is very little to no detail. Is there a reason you are using a 1/8 ball nose? With that model I would use the biggest one I have which is 3/4. This will increase the stepover significantly. Also, what feedrate are you using?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •