Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Hospital Bills?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,347
    Blog Entries
    1

    Hospital Bills?

    About a month ago we had a family member visit a hospital emergency room (he is fine). Yesterday we got a bill for $2200 telling us that was the portion not covered by our healthcare plan and please send a check for that amount. No breakout of the costs in the $2200 was shown. We called and asked for a detailed breakout of all the costs in included in the total bill , the details behind what the healthcare plan paid and the details behind what we owe. They immediately said we didn't owe $2200 but owed $800! I wonder if some people would have just sent a check for the $2200 without questioning them? I wonder if this is some kind of scam?
    Dennis

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Greater Hendersonville NC
    Posts
    310
    Often it is a matter of timing. Depending on the billing cycle of the hospital and the payment cycle of the insurance company, bills and payments can cross in the mail. Recommend that you call your insurance carrier and discuss the status of outstanding claims and bills.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    N.E, Ohio
    Posts
    3,026
    Everyone needs to insist on details. That is one good thing about Medicare. You can get a detailed EOB (Explanation of Benefits) that shows how much they approved and how much they paid toward each service provided and what the patient's responsibility is. The private insurances used to provide the same but have gotten away from it.

    Everyone must review their medical bills to keep from being taken advantage of. The other thing is do not pay any more than what your insurance says is your co-pay until all charges have been paid by the insurance. My father paid one bill and waited for over a year to get his money because the doctor would not furnish how my units of anesthesia were administered. The doctor had no interest because he was paid in full by my father so his office did not care. If they have some "skin in the game" they are much more likely to cooperate.

    George

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Virginia and Kentucky
    Posts
    3,364
    Almost all health providers will negotiate the price if you call them on the telephone. Our local hospital comes down to about half with a simple phone call. Scrutinize your bill and make the telephone call.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,582
    I almost never pay a medical bill until I am fairly certain that the insurance has been settled. Until that is done I really don't know what I owe. If anything I might send in a partial payment. Ever wait for a refund check from a hospital or doctor?? I have and it wasn't quick in coming.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    5,427
    My insurance plan sends an explanation of benefits for every insurance claim. My experience is that I don't get a bill from the doctor or hospital until after they have collected from insurance first.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Bedford, NH
    Posts
    1,286
    Not intending to hijack this thread, but everyone should be aware of the difference between being admitted overnight for "Treatment" vs. being admitted overnight for "Observation".

    Example based on Medicare & Medicare Part C insurance coverage:

    As explained to me by a CS Rep. for my Medicare Suplement Health insurance:

    If you are kept overnight for “Observation” for a typical non-emergency situation, that is not considered as being “Admitted”. It’s a different situation than being admitted normally for "Treatment". Medicare doesn’t cover this overnight stay for “Observation”. However, in this situation Supplementary insurance (Medicare Part C) becomes the “primary” insurer & the patient would only be responsible for the co-pay, in my case $65. However, if one is kept over for “Observation” following an emergency room treatment, Medicare still doesn’t cover the cost, the Supplemental insurer does. It’s considered an “outpatient” service & the patient would be responsible for this co-pay which in my case would be $300.
    Big difference how one is “admitted”. Be careful!
    Thoughts entering one's mind need not exit one's mouth!
    As I age my memory fades .... and that's a load off my mind!

    "We Live In The Land Of The Free, Only Because Of The Brave"
    “The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."
    "
    Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    N.E, Ohio
    Posts
    3,026
    Quote Originally Posted by Al Launier View Post
    Not intending to hijack this thread, but everyone should be aware of the difference between being admitted overnight for "Treatment" vs. being admitted overnight for "Observation".

    Example based on Medicare & Medicare Part C insurance coverage:

    As explained to me by a CS Rep. for my Medicare Suplement Health insurance:

    If you are kept overnight for “Observation” for a typical non-emergency situation, that is not considered as being “Admitted”. It’s a different situation than being admitted normally for "Treatment". Medicare doesn’t cover this overnight stay for “Observation”. However, in this situation Supplementary insurance (Medicare Part C) becomes the “primary” insurer & the patient would only be responsible for the co-pay, in my case $65. However, if one is kept over for “Observation” following an emergency room treatment, Medicare still doesn’t cover the cost, the Supplemental insurer does. It’s considered an “outpatient” service & the patient would be responsible for this co-pay which in my case would be $300.
    Big difference how one is “admitted”. Be careful!
    This is extremely important. BEWARE.

    George

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Hartland of Michigan
    Posts
    7,628
    One rule is to wait 1 year before paying the bill. It can take that long for everything to be ironed out.

    I recently spent 5 days, then 2 more when I had a defib unit implanted. Total bill was 200k. Insurance paid 67k and the hospital seems to be satisfied with that.
    Never, under any circumstances, consume a laxative and sleeping pill, on the same night

  10. #10
    Wholly cow.. 200k.. My head is spinning..

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Wayne, Pa.
    Posts
    498
    Quote Originally Posted by dennis thompson View Post
    About a month ago we had a family member visit a hospital emergency room (he is fine). Yesterday we got a bill for $2200 telling us that was the portion not covered by our healthcare plan and please send a check for that amount. No breakout of the costs in the $2200 was shown. We called and asked for a detailed breakout of all the costs in included in the total bill , the details behind what the healthcare plan paid and the details behind what we owe. They immediately said we didn't owe $2200 but owed $800! I wonder if some people would have just sent a check for the $2200 without questioning them? I wonder if this is some kind of scam?
    I would call your healthcare provider. I was very surprised a couple of times with what kind of information they could give me. Very helpful, like how to find a lower cost MRI (not everyone charges the same amount.)

    I recently had a bill for $500 from my local hospital for an ER visit by my wife. When I called them to tell them I would be paying in installments I was told not to pay it yet, as it had not gone through all the insurance completely. Unfortunately the bill did not get smaller and I'm in the process of paying it. This is a good practice by the way. Take your time to pay it...they don't care, they're happy to get the money.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    5,427
    If insurance is paying for something like an MRI why wouldn't the insurance company pay basically the same rate to any facility that has an MRI machine? I suppose some MRI machines might be better than others so they might be able to charge a little more. It seems wasteful to negotiate prices with every facility separately. If I ran an insurance company I would probably have a book of standard rates for basic procedures like MRIs and tell any facility that wanted to take my insurance to accept these prices or not accept my insurance.

    There is some thinking that a set fee per patient is the way to go, but that could mean your doctor skips an expensive test/procedure you really need to put more money in their pocket. With today's model there is no penalty to ordering more tests and procedures so doctors will order up everything to avoid liability.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Lewiston, Idaho
    Posts
    28,504
    There are a lot of variables that go into why hospital charges vary from hospital to hospital.

    Did you know that in some cases, Medicare doesn't even cover the expenses a hospital incurs when they perform a certain exam? Thus they mark it up and those of us with insurance pay more to cover the amount the hospital lost to Medicare.

    Did you know that often large companies and corporations are "self-insured" but have a insurance company administering the program?

    Insurance companies often have an agreement with hospitals but it's not always on a nationwide basis. For example, when I had my cochlear implant surgery, the cost was $138,000 for everything including the surgeon, the hospital expenses, the internal implant, 2 sound processors and accessories. My out of pocket expenses were minimal since I was able to have the surgery by an "in-network" surgeon and at an "in-network" hospital. The insurance company didn't pay the "$138,000" bill either. They paid a little over half.

    Different hospitals incur different costs for various reasons. For example, the hospital in Grangeville, Idaho has a very low surrounding population density. The cost of have a CT scan there may be more than having it at St. Joseph Regional Medical Center, Lewiston, Idaho. You can argue that the smaller hospital doesn't necessarily need a CT scanner but tell that to the family of the logger who's injured in a logging accident, driven a short distance to Syringa Hospital in Grangeville where the CT scan indicates severe but treatable, survivable brain damage if treated quickly and he's helicoptered to St. Joe's for neurosurgery rather than driven by ambulance for over an hour. Yet, Syringa Hospital has a mobile MRI that comes into town 1 day a week so local patients don't have to drive 75 miles to the hospital with a resident MRI.

    That smaller hospital doesn't have a CT scanner with all the whistles and bells. They don't do as many patients but still have to pay for their lower cost scanner.

    The cost of labor can differ tremendously around the country and thus labor expenses become a variable depending on location.

    The cost of utilities varies by location and varying weather etc. effect expenses and thus hospital charges.

    There are a lot of reasons hospitals to have varying charges.
    Last edited by Ken Fitzgerald; 07-29-2014 at 2:15 PM.
    Ken

    So much to learn, so little time.....

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    5,427
    I'm thinking more about hospitals in a large metro area where you may have several hospitals within miles of each other. We must have 20+ hospitals in the metro area here. The state actually has a moratorium on building new hospitals. Why shouldn't the insurance companies pay the same for facilities that should have similar expenses? One facility may have a higher res MRI and then yes, the insurance company maybe should pay a little more, but what about all the cases where a higher res MRI is of no value? (I have no idea if there really are higher resolution MRI machines or not.)

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Wayne, Pa.
    Posts
    498
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Elfert View Post
    If insurance is paying for something like an MRI why wouldn't the insurance company pay basically the same rate to any facility that has an MRI machine? I suppose some MRI machines might be better than others so they might be able to charge a little more. It seems wasteful to negotiate prices with every facility separately. If I ran an insurance company I would probably have a book of standard rates for basic procedures like MRIs and tell any facility that wanted to take my insurance to accept these prices or not accept my insurance.

    There is some thinking that a set fee per patient is the way to go, but that could mean your doctor skips an expensive test/procedure you really need to put more money in their pocket. With today's model there is no penalty to ordering more tests and procedures so doctors will order up everything to avoid liability.
    My insurance company was helping me find the best rate. I don't recall if they pay a percentage or flat rate for the MRI. If it's a percentage it's pretty easy to figure out why they help a person find the cheaper imaging joint.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •