Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 56

Thread: A Bad Beer Thread

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    north, OR
    Posts
    1,160
    The general dislike of fruit beers is interesting but somewhat unsurprising. There are a lot of really horrible ones out there, I would however encourage folks to keep an open mind on them though. There seem to be more that are actually good nowadays than used to be (lindemans notwithsanding although thier Cuvee Rene Grande Cru is acceptable). As with most things its a sense of balance and appropriateness of amount that makes them work or not. This is true of most of the additives, the product should be enhanced by (smoke, bourbon, etc...) not overwhelmed by it.

    Worst beer I ever had was at a sour beer tasting (again like many "styles" sours can be amazingly good or really horrid) and one has enterobacter contamination. That is NOT a flavor you will soon forget (and I've tasted some small amounts in several other beers since now that my taste buds are "sensitized" - enterobacter adds "acetaldehyde, methyl acetate, diacetyl, 2,3-pentanedione and dimethyl sulphide" in various amounts and the flavor profile can be best described as a woody poo like flavor).

    Second worst was a cream ale that would have been more accurately described as a "creamed corn ale" the amount of DMS in that beer was overwhelming.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jason Roehl View Post
    The kits I've been using come with unhopped Liquid Malt Extract and typically a pound or two of crushed grains, then a few ounces of hops. Heat water, steep the grains, dissolve the LME, boil, add hops, boil, add more hops, cool, pitch the yeast, etc. I'm wanting to switch to all grain, using the brew-in-a-bag method, which skips the sparging/mash tun setup, and uses a nylon mesh bag for the grains. I have a friend who swears by the method. Google it. The BIAB method will keep me alive, since I just ordered a new, heavy-duty, 10-gallon brew pot last night (~$175). I don't think I could get the rest of a sparging setup past my wife at this point and live to tell about it.
    BIAB works pretty well, you'll get slightly lower extract efficiency than some other methods but at homebrew scale it doesn't matter much. My biggest dislike of it is that its somewhat messier than a mash tun setup (I've been using the 2 gott coolers and a brewpot for ~12 years or so, about 5 I added another hot water heater which allowed me to overlap brews and do 2 all grain batches in about 4 hours.)

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Thien View Post
    7% or 8% is okay, much above that and I do start to feel like it is too "boozy" (very good word for that, now I'll know what to tell my friends that try to give me the strong stuff).
    Some of my friends make beer in the 10%+ range that's not boozy at all.. and that's a very risky situation indeed!

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Coastal Massachusetts
    Posts
    6,824
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Bourque View Post
    I'm not sure if it was the beer that was naturally horrible, or the fact it was sitting around in a Scranton warehouse for 9 years before we bought it that made it taste so bad.
    They were ahead of the trends, "bottle aged" brew.
    (Synonymous with "Can't sell this stuff for antifreeze.")

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Western Nebraska
    Posts
    4,680
    I don't have access to those fancy craft brews some of you mention. My dislikes are much more towards the cheap end. Busch Light is horrible IMHO, as where any of the Ice beers that were a fad 20 years ago. Having tried a few flavored, I don't know the right term, like fruit and vanilla, I also hate every one I've tried. Beer should taste like beer, there again IMHO.

    I don't drink often, but due to a nostalgic whim, I found that I quite like original Coors and Miller High Life,so obviously I have no clue what good beer should taste like.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    north, OR
    Posts
    1,160
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Rozmiarek View Post
    Beer should taste like beer, there again IMHO.
    Sure but what does beer taste like?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Mandalay Shores, CA
    Posts
    2,690
    Blog Entries
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason Roehl View Post
    Shawn, I think you're a bit confused on the terms. The kits I've been using come with unhopped Liquid Malt Extract and typically a pound or two of crushed grains, then a few ounces of hops. Heat water, steep the grains, dissolve the LME, boil, add hops, boil, add more hops, cool, pitch the yeast, etc. I'm wanting to switch to all grain, using the brew-in-a-bag method, which skips the sparging/mash tun setup, and uses a nylon mesh bag for the grains. I have a friend who swears by the method. Google it. The BIAB method will keep me alive, since I just ordered a new, heavy-duty, 10-gallon brew pot last night (~$175). I don't think I could get the rest of a sparging setup past my wife at this point and live to tell about it.
    No, I wasn't confused. The kit you were using was exactly what I thought. The problem with kits as I see it, you get stale grains, hops, and yeast. But at least it's not a good selection If the fresh hops, pellets (I don't care for them, I use fresh leaf hops), and yeasts aren't kept cold, they rapidly deteriorate. Admittedly, I haven't seen many kits. But I am usually asked to coach a newbies' brew when they start down the hybrid / extract process.

    I am glad you are moving on. Your approach with the grain bag will work. However, you really don't have good control of the temperature. Ultimately, you'll want that. But I did the bag (Grain Bags, not the brew bags - gag) for some time before going all grain. You can make excellent beer this way but it is harder to be consistent. Consistently good. A slow controlled sparge does make a difference. I hope you have a tap / fitting on the 10 gallon pot to move the liquids. Lifting and moving 80 lbs of hot water gets dicey.

    There are four things to think about when making consistent, good beer: Ingredient quality, Sanitation, Record-keeping and Precision. When you sparge an all grain batch, depending upon the freshness and types of the malt and the grind (I try to use within 24 hrs of the grind), the precision of the mash / sparging water will ensure the Maltose is converted by the enzymes to the sugar distribution you are looking for. This can have a marked effect in the beer (when you get it right that is). Depending upon the sugars and the yeast, having control of these can help you to produce the right esters and fusel alcohols in the right proportions. The esters are an incredibly small volume / proportion, yet they are what drive the beers taste profile. As you proceed to become an excellent brewer you may find yourself forced to focus on the Biochemistry. Good beer - control and balance of the esters. Good luck! You are on the right track! Making alcohol is easy, making consistent, good beer is hard.
    Last edited by Shawn Pixley; 08-29-2014 at 9:49 PM.
    Shawn

    "no trees were harmed in the creation of this message, however some electrons were temporarily inconvenienced."

    "I resent having to use my brain to do your thinking"

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    north, OR
    Posts
    1,160
    Shaun, IMHO you're being unduly harsh on both kits and BIAB. You aren't wrong on what matters but I think you might be biased by remembrance of sad days past. This is similar to some of the antipathy I see towards dry yeast, yes some (OK most/all) of the dry yeast used to be horrid, but some of the modern stuff is darn good, cheaper than the slurries and actually had a higher cell count. You just have to choose wisely.

    Some of the newer kits are actually pretty good.. They're freshly made on demand and shipped out pretty quickly. Better than that dubious can/jar of LME that has been sitting on the shelf for good knows how long anyway (and the cans omg the cans no!!). However they certainly are not a good value proposition as you can buy the individual ingredients somewhat cheaper and even better if you can stock up at all. I wouldn't stock up on LME of course but I do on vacuum sealed DME, it's somewhat cheaper by the 50lb bag and lasts quite well vacuum sealed.

    I usually have 100-200 lbs of various base grains and about that much adjunct in stock and keep 5-10lbs of hops in vacuum seal bags in the freezer. Usually buy DME in 50lb sacks and vacuum seal it in 5lb bags for extra O.G. for strong beers or yeast starters. Gamma seal lids are really my best friend.

    As far as BIAB, once you've figured the heat loss of your base system you should be able to hit mash temperature just as accurately with the BIAB as you can with any other setup. If you're chasing mash temps you need to sit back and get more comfortable with your calculator and get your strike water temp under control. Mash temp is a pretty easy base temperature/lb/qt with the system loss added in. For BIAB your system loss should be more predictable than with a separate mash tun even as you've already heated the vessel the mash is going into. Remember the profile of the wort is largely set in the first 15m.

    Personally I'd work on fermentation temp control next before I got overly stressed about the BIAG issues, unless you decide you just don't like the system for other reasons (which is what I found after a couple of trys long ago).

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Western Nebraska
    Posts
    4,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Mooney View Post
    Sure but what does beer taste like?
    LOL, heck I have no idea!

  8. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Mooney View Post
    Sure but what does beer taste like?
    Beer should taste like the one I'm drinking now!

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Burlington, Vermont
    Posts
    2,443
    The local coop and liquor stores have a huge selection of "craft" brews, and we're blessed in Vermont with a whole lot of smaller breweries.

    I will say the one thing I dislike are the super super hoppy beers that have become popular in the small beer scene - things with whacky names touting their "extreme hops" and such - I like a mildly hoppy beer, but it's like there's a contest to see how much you can cram in a beer. One local brew, Heady Topper, doesn't exactly make a selling point of the hop-ness like some of the others I've seen, but people go crazy over it, and I find it basically undrinkable after the first few sips because of how hoppy it is. But I do prefer a more malty beer.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    6,981
    I'm not overly fond of Christmas Ales or anything that tastes like fruit and/or pine needles.

    Course who am I to judge anything?

    I've been known to have Nyquil as an after dinner drink!
    My granddad always said, :As one door closes, another opens".
    Wonderful man, terrible cabinet maker...

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Hatfield, AR
    Posts
    1,170
    Quote Originally Posted by Judson Green View Post
    Doesn't Wisconsin still rank #1 for binge drinking?


    If not #1 for binging, they're #1 for the biggest 6'er.
    -Lud

  12. #42
    First time drunken driving in this state (WI) is also not a criminal offense. I think that is regardless of the BAC.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Lafayette, IN
    Posts
    4,563
    Thanks for the info, Shawn. My intended path is to continually improve the tools and process as I am able (financially and mentally), without going for the award-winner--either in setup or product. I've discovered that getting too technical too fast only causes my eyes to glaze over, so I'm following the KISS principle (hence the BIAB). Obviously as I become comfortable with each upgrade, "too complex" becomes a moving target, but I've read enough brewing theory to make my head spin. I understand it, there's just no way I'd be able to keep it all straight while brewing, and having it written down in front of me while brewing would slow me down too much. I want beer, not hopped LME.

    What I get now is acceptable beer to me, but I'm open to improvement. I imagine there will be a point of diminishing returns, at which point, I would be content with not going further into major setup or process tweaks. I will confess that my record-keeping has not been more than noting the brew date, primary-secondary transfer date, OG and FG on the instruction sheets that come in the kits. Not all of those still exist, I don't think. I want to be able to enjoy brewing and "get'r'done", without going too OCD (as runs deep in my blood).

    I actually just planted two hops plants this year, and there are a couple startup hop farms in the state, including one locally, so I'm hoping for some very fresh hops in the future. At the very least, we have a large deep freezer, a good dehydrator and a vacuum sealer. (That reminds me--I need to check if the handful of hops I do have are ready...)
    Last edited by Jason Roehl; 08-30-2014 at 4:58 PM. Reason: Corrected spelling of Shawn's name.
    Jason

    "Don't get stuck on stupid." --Lt. Gen. Russel Honore


  14. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Mandalay Shores, CA
    Posts
    2,690
    Blog Entries
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Mooney View Post
    Shaun, IMHO you're being unduly harsh on both kits and BIAB. You aren't wrong on what matters but I think you might be biased by remembrance of sad days past.
    I've been brewing since 1984 and win awards to this day. Did anyone ask you to be the brewmaster for a brew pub? (Admittedly I didn't think I was ready for that scale and made a better living doing architecture). I didn't say you couldn't make good beers from grain bags or extract / grain mixes. I did and still can. Others can and do as well. But the limitations of stale or limited choices in a kit is just that, a limitation. You can taste the differences in using say Cascade hops vs say Goldings as the bittering hops even if you get the same IBU's. Most of the new material forms of ingredients like pelleted hops are to address different issues such as convenience or shelf life (not taste). Pellets don't taste as good but are definitely more convenient. With greater exposure to air in pelletizing, some taste is lost. Leaf hops taste better but are much more sensitive to heat and oxygen exposure. They should be refrigerated at all times. Filtering out the various residue from the grain, hops and proteins is not fun and most homebrewers aren't particularly good at it. It shows in the lack of clarity of their beers. For styles such as a Wit, the lack of clarity gets them poor marks in competition. Many home brewers introduce oxygen after fermentation which can create skunky esters in the beer. Dry hopping with pellets is just wrong.

    Additionally, If you start with dry yeast you have a much more limited selection of yeasts. Dry yeasts are more shelf-life friendly and they are selected for that attribute, not taste. Moreover, most do not prepare dry yeast properly and end up under-inoculating the wort with yeast. This often produces unpleasant esters. You will taste it in the finished beer.

    My point on the bags is that the water temperature in the center of the bag will not be the same as that of the water outside of the bag. This is especially true when you get beyond five gallon batches. Additionally, you are extracting more of the sugars from some grains but not others in the bag, leaching more proteins out that later have to be removed. If / when you swish the bag around (which I have seen many a homebrewer do), your water temperature changes due to exposure to the air. When this happens the enzymes do not produce the sugar profile you are seeking. The enzymes on the crushed (not chopped) malted barley are very temperature sensitive with a range of +/- 2 degrees F between activating different enzymes. One of the results of this lack of temperature control is inconsistency from batch to batch. I have done that in the past and then experienced the differences from batch to batch on the same recipe. When you do things right, and with precision, you gain control of a complicated, multi-variable system.

    I am not promoting that people shouldn't home brew, but only that there are ways to enhance the qualities of your brew. There is a step up in the the quality of your brewing process when you go all grain with a proper mash / sparge setup. Getting the mix of sugars that will ferment or non-ferment materially changes the flavor profile. Contrary to other all-grain home brewers, I tend to use more or completely specialty grains rather than simple sugaring grains (2 row or 6 row plain barley). It is more expensive, but I think one can taste the difference. It really isn't that difficult to buy / build a proper sparge set-up for 5-6 gallon batches. Most all the materials store inside the larger vessels. Admittedly, I tend to value high precision in most things. I am also largely a neander in woodworking and I think that extends to brewing. Making alcohol is easy, making "beer" is somewhat hard, making good beer is hard, and making consistent good beer is harder still. But it ultimately is the goal. I offer my advice freely. No one has to take it.

    As to the kits, having watched them being assembled at various places, I'll stand by my opinion.
    Shawn

    "no trees were harmed in the creation of this message, however some electrons were temporarily inconvenienced."

    "I resent having to use my brain to do your thinking"

  15. #45
    Shawn and Ryan have given us a civil and interesting exchange on brewing. Next time I taste a beer I don't like I will take
    comfort in knowing it was a lot of trouble to someone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •