This just shows a lack of imagination on your part.
Alan Lacer did a series of articles in AAW's journal that compared the edges produced by dry grinding (with and without honing) with the edge from a Tormek (with and without honing). Bottom line: A tool sharpened on a Tormek is sharper than one off of a dry grinder -- with or without honing. There are two reasons for this: First, the Tormek's stone is 1,000 grit, which produces a finer edge than does a 600 grit hone. Second, and more importantly, the burr produced by dry grinding HSS is very durable. On a skew, it typically folds over on contact with the wood (or a hone), more than doubling the thickness of the edge. It takes a lot of honing to remove the burr!
One last comment on a topic that is not free from controversy: It is true that HSS holds its temper better than high carbon steel. You have to get the HSS much, much hotter before it loses its temper, but it will still lose its temper if you get it hot enough. Can you produce that kind of heat with dry grinding? Most say no. Some say yes. This is the point of controversy. At the very edge, where the metal is at its thinnest, would a heavy hand on the grinder produce enough heat to take the temper out? I think so. At least, that seems to be what was happening when I was first learning to sharpen my bowl gouges on a high speed grinder. I blued the end of the tool and, at the very edge, I got the metal a bright red. (Note: the tool was fine just a 1/16th of an inch away from the edge.) As I learned to use a lighter touch, my bowl gouges stayed sharper longer, so I think I took the temper out of the tool at the very edge. My son, who's Masters thesis analyzed the properties of various high speed steels agrees with my hypothesis. It's possible to draw the temper of HSS with too heavy a hand on the grinder. This isn't an issue with a Tormek.