Originally Posted by
ian maybury
Hi Brian. I think i must as my old primary school teacher used to say be a Philistine. (as opposed to a Neanderthal) It's a bit like the old tool versus new tool thing.
It's not that i can't see the beauty/attraction of an old style wooden screw like that. I can even appreciate that it does a perfectly acceptable job, and that it's mostly a case of getting used to its vagaries. (that it wobbles side to side, that using a strip of tapered wood on the floor as a spacer causes the chop to tip sideways and either twist or at least apply uneven pressure side to side of the jaw, that the bench has to be heavy enough and the floor flat enough that the chop can't rotate as a result of the friction from the collar under the screw, that the extra bit of friction isn't a big deal anyway, and that there may even be times when a bit of slop is useful when clamping tapered work and the like...)
I'm less keen on the loose handle - having spent years as a kid with blood blisters on my hands caused by getting skin pinched between the boss and the knobs at the end of the handles when a similar example of the latter dropped down on an old metalworking vise.
It's just that in my personal value system (and each to his/her own) i can't see the point in not going the extra 1/10 mile to install a criss cross or parallel and a hand wheel - and get everything lined up carefully so that it all works smoothly and predictably...
This is not from personal experience, but from what I have gathered from others;
Some prefer this method because they can choose a pinch clamp or bias the clamp to hold tapered objects.
Bumbling forward into the unknown.