Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 172

Thread: Tight mouths in wooden double iron planes.

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    Quote Originally Posted by Kees Heiden View Post
    Thanks a lot for the updates, both Steve and Stewie.

    On my newest plane builds I have choosen a higher wear angle. They are now about 83 degrees for a 45 degree bedded plane. I'll see how tight I can get the mouth. I am not quite there yet in my proficiancy in plane making.

    A picture of the smoother, subject of this thread, at work:

    Attachment 333269
    Kees. You may find the following of interest in keeping the mouth opening tight.

    Stewie;

    Last edited by Stewie Simpson; 03-08-2016 at 9:11 PM.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    Taking a break from other project work I took some time out to test the 12* wedge making jig. Before being passed through the table saw the wedge stock was secured in place with double sided tape. Final dimensioning was completed using a traditional wooden smoothing plane. The solid packing template for kerfing the outer wedge abutments was also completed.

    Last edited by Stewie Simpson; 03-13-2016 at 1:37 AM.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,457
    Yes it is pretty obvious when you think about it, raising the wear angle without opening the mouth.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,494
    I did essentially the same thing on an infill to increase flow while retaining a 60 degree bed.







    Of course, I had to keep the hollow low as there was a 1/4" thick sole, which was also filed back from the vertical (I cannot recall the angle). I recall doing this with Stanley planes many years ago, having read one of David Charlesworth's articles in a magazine (before they were published in a book).

    Regards from Perth

    Derek

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,457
    BTW, you don't really need a jig to cut a wedge

    foto (7).jpg

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    Kees. I plan to repeat the same wedge profile on some future woodies, so that jig is going to come in handy. I have a bad habit of planning ahead with my project work.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,457
    I was just kidding. I am now working on my last two bench planes, a try and a jointer. I don't think I need more then 5 bench planes.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,494
    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie Simpson View Post
    Taking a break from other project work I took some time out to test the 12* wedge making jig. Before being passed through the table saw the wedge stock was secured in place with double sided tape. Final dimensioning was completed using a traditional wooden smoothing plane. The solid packing template for kerfing the outer wedge abutments was also completed.

    Doesn't the "jig" lie in the wrong direction to plane the wedge? Surely the wedge will slide out if you are planing with the grain? How else would you do this?

    Regards from Perth

    Derek

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    Hi Derek. The grain direction on the top surface of the wedge is running left to right (as seen within the photo). Relying on the side grain view to indicate the direction of top surface grain can be misleading due to the unique shape of the wedge.

    Stewie;

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Williamsburg,Va.
    Posts
    12,402
    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie Simpson View Post
    Kees. You may find the following of interest in keeping the mouth opening tight.

    Stewie;

    stewie,I am suspicious as to where this picture came from. It shows an incorrect representation of the sole of the plane. Unless there is also a contact area right in front of the iron,this plane will soon be generating a convex surface on the wood it cuts. Just like a compass plane. I know who thinks this is correct as drawn,but it is not.

    Also,since the angle that the iron rests upon will also be worn back as the sole wears,or is dressed repeatedly,the mouth will still be opened anyway,it seems to me. Maybe I am wrong? Dunno,late night,headache this A.M.!New pain meds are not pleasant. But I am not wrong about the needed configuration of the sole to have 3 contact points.
    Last edited by george wilson; 03-13-2016 at 9:59 AM.

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,494
    I think you are right, George. The plane (kanna) should be touching at three points - heel, mouth and toe. This is only touching at the heel and toe. Poor drawing?

    Regards from Perth

    Derek

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    7,298
    Blog Entries
    7
    The deficiencies of that drawing were pointed out here as well;

    http://thecarpentryway.blogspot.com/...-and-wave.html
    Bumbling forward into the unknown.

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Williamsburg,Va.
    Posts
    12,402
    As I said,I'm suspicious of who made that drawing. If it is him,apparently he still does not understand how his specialty area,which includes Japanese planes,work. Or else it is an old drawing. Even the acknowledged master, Odate, shows a 3 point contact area on the soles of Japanese planes in diagrams in his book. At least in the book I SAW! (The link above shows only 2 points of contact.) Though I don't use Japanese planes(my back won't allow it),I,or anyone with a REASONABLE grasp of mechanics,can easily see that the 3rd. contact area,right in front of the throat,is needed,to keep the plane from becoming a compass plane.

    Of course,that issue is not the subject under discussion here.
    Last edited by george wilson; 03-13-2016 at 11:10 AM.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    7,298
    Blog Entries
    7
    George, he points out the drawing as being incorrect for a truing plane and mentions exactly what you did, which is that the two outside points and long hollow make a compass plane.
    Bumbling forward into the unknown.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    The 1st stage of mortising out of the escarpment has commenced; from the blade bed to the wear line, working along the inside abutment lines. In effect forming 4 flat surfaces; front, back, and the 2 side walls that separate them.





    The assortment of hand tools I am using. Right side of the planemaker floats is a Logier Sapphire Coated Luthier Rasp. Cut #11 on 1 face; Cut # 13 on the opposing face. Its the 1st opportunity I have had to use this rasp since I purchased it 12 months ago fro planemaking work. Its quite aggressive, but it leaves reasonably a smooth finish to the surface of the wood. Ideal for the flat bed surfaces you need to create when working on traditional wooden bench planes. Next to the Logier Rasp are 2 chalking templates I used to level off the flat surfaces formed after mortising. At a later stage the chalking technique will again be used to achieve a precise fit of the wooden wedge within its abutments.

    imo, if you don't possess the correct temperament within your work, its best to avoid traditionally mortised out wooden bench planes. Steve Voigt and Kees may wish to add their own comment.

    Last edited by Stewie Simpson; 03-15-2016 at 2:46 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •