Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 49

Thread: Jointer planes-size, chip breaker or not?

  1. #16
    I usually go by the 1.5-2x length rule as well. Longer stuff I'll use my #8, shorter things I'll use my #6. Really short things I'll use my LV bevel up smoother or a block plane.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Engel View Post
    Short answer, no [using a 5-1/2 for boards up to 24 or 36"], it will not be satisfactory.
    The critical figure of merit here is the ratio of the workpiece length to the plane length. Claiming that a 5-1/2 (15" long) can't adequately joint a 24" board is equivalent to claiming that a #7 can't adequately joint a 35" workpiece, and I think we all know that's bunk.

    Mike, for a 36" piece you'd ideally want a slightly longer plane but it will work if your technique is good. It's equivalent to using a #7 on a 53" workpiece, which isn't uncommon. At 24" the 5-1/2 is perfect.
    Last edited by Patrick Chase; 04-26-2016 at 12:51 PM.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Prashun Patel View Post
    I think a #7ish plane is a good investment if you have the forearms for it, because it does more of the guesswork for you.
    If you're using your forearms to drive your #7 then you're making life needlessly hard for yourself :-)

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    twomiles from the "peak of Ohio
    Posts
    12,183
    After a few hours of using them bigger planes,,,sore forearms are the least of the problem.....shoulders.....the area of the back between the shoulders......neck gets stiff.....things like that. Good thing the biggest of the jointers is a bit lighter in weight..
    IMAG0112.jpg
    Stanley No. 31....24" long. weighs about half of a Stanley #8c did. Yeah, yeah, it only has a 2-3/8" wide iron.....didn't really need the extra 2/8" in width, anyway.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by steven c newman View Post
    After a few hours of using them bigger planes,,,sore forearms are the least of the problem.....shoulders.....the area of the back between the shoulders......neck gets stiff.....things like that. Good thing the biggest of the jointers is a bit lighter in weight..
    IMAG0112.jpg
    Stanley No. 31....24" long. weighs about half of a Stanley #8c did. Yeah, yeah, it only has a 2-3/8" wide iron.....didn't really need the extra 2/8" in width, anyway.
    Burn baby, burn (see also the para and picture just before the #21 section).

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    twomiles from the "peak of Ohio
    Posts
    12,183
    Well, I have the #26, the # 28, #29, and the #31......there is also an 035 in the till. No complaints with them, at all.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,582
    Quote Originally Posted by steven c newman View Post
    After a few hours of using them bigger planes,,,sore forearms are the least of the problem.....shoulders.....the area of the back between the shoulders......neck gets stiff.....things like that. Good thing the biggest of the jointers is a bit lighter in weight..
    IMAG0112.jpg
    Stanley No. 31....24" long. weighs about half of a Stanley #8c did. Yeah, yeah, it only has a 2-3/8" wide iron.....didn't really need the extra 2/8" in width, anyway.
    That plane is practically as long as the board you are jointing. That in itself makes for too much work. You are expending too much effort to hold that thing level for the amount of work you are getting accomplished. In fact, I wonder if you can actually get the edge straight with a plane that long. Thank your stars and neck / back that its a transistional
    Last edited by Pat Barry; 04-26-2016 at 6:39 PM.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    twomiles from the "peak of Ohio
    Posts
    12,183
    That board was 36" long, the plane is 24". I wrap the front hand around the body of the plane, using the knuckles as a fence. Board was part of a five board glue up
    IMAG0104.jpg
    Seemed to work out fairly well.....

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,582
    Quote Originally Posted by steven c newman View Post
    That board was 36" long, the plane is 24". I wrap the front hand around the body of the plane, using the knuckles as a fence. Board was part of a five board glue up
    IMAG0104.jpg
    Seemed to work out fairly well.....
    It did turn out nice! The picture was very deceptive

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Ste-Julienne, Qc, Canada
    Posts
    194
    For many years all I had was a LV bevel-up jointer and a Stanley no.4. I've added bevel down planes of all sizes to those. The more I use the bevel down - comparing with bevel-up - the more I like them. I'm hardly using my LV BU plane at this stage.
    Because I like to sharpen free hand, the use of a BU plane isn't great because, for all those high angles, I have to go back to a guide. It also seems to me that the surface finish of a BD is nicer than a BU with a high angle.
    As for the length, if my plane is 1/3 of board length, I'm fine with it.

  11. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat Barry View Post
    That plane is practically as long as the board you are jointing. That in itself makes for too much work. You are expending too much effort to hold that thing level for the amount of work you are getting accomplished. In fact, I wonder if you can actually get the edge straight with a plane that long. Thank your stars and neck / back that its a transistional
    A cooper's jointer is usually far longer than that thing.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Dickinson, Texas
    Posts
    7,655
    Blog Entries
    1
    My 607 Bedrock works just fine on a shooting board. I don't feel the need for another plane. It also does great with the board in a vise.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by steven c newman View Post
    Well, I have the #26, the # 28, #29, and the #31......there is also an 035 in the till. No complaints with them, at all.
    The Schwartz is with you.

    Seriously, those are amazingly polarizing planes. I haven't used one to any great extent, so I have no actual opinion of them either way. Leach's writeup cracks me up though.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Milton, GA
    Posts
    3,213
    Blog Entries
    1
    My challenge at the moment is making tapered/staked chair/table legs usually from oak. I do not have a lathe and do not plan to buy one any time soon as I may be moving. This work can be very time consuming.

    The challenge is more like making a bench top from glued up hard wood boards than making a single edge flat & 90 degrees to the surface of a board. It requires many strokes to make four or more octagonal chair or table legs from rough wood or splits. I started out using a #5 with a cambered blade to do the heavy stock removal. I have been experimenting with # 5 1/4, #5, #5 1/2, #6 & BU Jointer. I am thinking either the 5 1/4 or 5 to make a taper square, the heavy stock removal. Once I get the heavy work done I am thinking about a 5 1/2 or 6 to work the square into a reasonably equal sided octagon. A full size metal jointer gets heavy fairly quickly. I may work on my Purple Heart jointer so I will have something lighter. I am not going to get too concerned with the legs being exactly the same and even so I may or may not finish with a smooth plane.

  15. #30
    I strongly believe that for most furniture work a #4 and a #7 are fine for all jointing tasks. The #5 would be nice too, but in my case it is setup as a jack plane with strongly cambered blade.

    The #4 for all small stuff, up to twice the length of the plane. The rest with the #7. Only for really large stuff like entry doors, large dining tables etc, the long woodies come in nicely. They are usually dirt cheap and are easilly trued up, so no reason really not to find one. Those long transitionals look usefull for this task too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •