Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 41 of 41

Thread: Need for permits

  1. #31
    So you can build a 10x12 shed without a permit, but you MUST have one to erect a light post?????
    Gerry

    JointCAM

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Eastern Iowa
    Posts
    751
    Quote Originally Posted by Gerry Grzadzinski View Post
    So you can build a 10x12 shed without a permit, but you MUST have one to erect a light post?????
    Yes, it is electrical.
    Comments made here are my own and, according to my children, do not reflect the opinions of any other person... anywhere, anytime.

  3. #33
    But the electrical wasn't the issue.
    Gerry

    JointCAM

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    5,455
    Electrical inspectors inspect electrical. They don't look at building code issues. Many electrical inspectors locally work for themselves and not for government. Their goal is to inspect fairly quickly so they get onto the next inspection. They have to do quite a few inspections per day to make a decent living.

    My previous house was built with a huge bonus space over the garage that was framed for two additional bedrooms and a bathroom during construction. I finished the space some years later and did the wiring myself. I had the rough-in inspection done and the inspector was literally in the space for less than 30 seconds. He said it looked like I knew what I was doing and signed off. He spent more time walking to/from his car than actually looking at the electrical.

  5. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Elfert View Post
    My previous house was built with a huge bonus space over the garage that was framed for two additional bedrooms and a bathroom during construction. I finished the space some years later and did the wiring myself. I had the rough-in inspection done and the inspector was literally in the space for less than 30 seconds. He said it looked like I knew what I was doing and signed off. He spent more time walking to/from his car than actually looking at the electrical.
    So do you think the inspection was without value? For something like bedrooms where the electrical is only lights and outlets, it probably only takes 30 seconds to confirm that it's done correctly. For every inspection like yours, I bet that inspector has to deal with one that takes 30 minutes to explain things like:
    -no, you can't run an oven on 14awg
    -no, you can't reuse that old piece of aluminum wiring
    -no, you can't run THHN outside of conduit
    -no, you can't splice some Romex together with electrical tape

    etc.

    He may have only been there 30 seconds, but if you did the work correctly, I bet he was able to mentally run through a HUGE list of potential problems and see that they didn't apply to your situation in that short time.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    5,455
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Friedrichs View Post
    So do you think the inspection was without value? For something like bedrooms where the electrical is only lights and outlets, it probably only takes 30 seconds to confirm that it's done correctly. For every inspection like yours, I bet that inspector has to deal with one that takes 30 minutes to explain things like:
    I was just making the point that electrical inspectors do their work quickly. They aren't building inspectors unless something is glaringly obvious.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    2,475
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Elfert View Post
    Many electrical inspectors locally work for themselves and not for government.
    I'm trying to make sense of this. If the town is paying them to be an inspector, then during their inspections, they are working for the town. They are doing these inspections in the name of the town that hired them and if there is a problem, it is the town that will have ultimately have to answer for a lax inspection.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    north, OR
    Posts
    1,160
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Zellers View Post
    I'm trying to make sense of this. If the town is paying them to be an inspector, then during their inspections, they are working for the town. They are doing these inspections in the name of the town that hired them and if there is a problem, it is the town that will have ultimately have to answer for a lax inspection.
    Not generally true (I mean you can certainly sue and in some rare cases win but your odds are low), the inspecting authority is not liable for failure to identify safety or even compliance issues if they are not glaringly obvious (and even then the liability is very limited).

    http://scholarship.law.campbell.edu/...02&context=clr
    http://www.rutan.com/pubs/xpqPublica...etail&pub=1541
    http://www.coler.com/pdf/MunicipalBu...Inspectors.pdf
    https://www.mikameyers.com/news/arti...cted-residence

    A search for "municipal inspection liability" will take you much further down this rabbit hole than you'd ever want to go.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    2,475
    Then municipal inspection is rather worthless.

    Maybe it was diligent, maybe it wasn't.

    Yay government!

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    3,970
    I don't see how inspection in this case would have accomplished anything at all. It is not possible to prevent people from doing stupid things or allowing their children to do so. If the lamp post were engineered to withstand heavy side loads, then someone would inevitably run their car into the lamp post and get hurt. There would then be people would be complaining that the lamp post was not engineered to break away during side loading and we would see the same silly arguments about lack of inspections.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    5,455
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Zellers View Post
    I'm trying to make sense of this. If the town is paying them to be an inspector, then during their inspections, they are working for the town. They are doing these inspections in the name of the town that hired them and if there is a problem, it is the town that will have ultimately have to answer for a lax inspection.
    They are inspecting on behalf of the city. The city still issues the permits. My point is that they are paid by the inspection, not by the hour. They have a monetary incentive to do as many inspections as possible in a day to maximize their revenue. Cities do this because they don't have enough work to have a full time electrical inspector. Independent electrical inspectors usually inspect for several cities.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •