Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Is this a Practical Design for a Rocking Chair

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Virginia and Kentucky
    Posts
    3,364

    Is this a Practical Design for a Rocking Chair

    I like this rocking chair, but the design seems to have the arms far too high, the arms are straight, and the back seems narrow for some of the wider folks in the world. Do you folks think this would be a good one for practical use, or is this a conversation piece?

    Cherry Rocker.jpg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,582
    You'd have to ride it a while to properly judge it IMO. Nothing wrong with the basic concept though.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    McKean, PA
    Posts
    15,649
    Blog Entries
    1
    If you are planning on making this rocker, you could easily change the arm height to suit you needs. As far as supporting "wider folks", there are a lot of rockers that are more heavy duty that might be better suited for that application. Delicate furniture needs to be treated with some level of restraint when it comes to "wider folks".
    Lee Schierer
    USNA '71
    Go Navy!

    My advice, comments and suggestions are free, but it costs money to run the site. If you found something of value here please give a little something back by becoming a contributor! Please Contribute

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Dickinson, Texas
    Posts
    7,655
    Blog Entries
    1
    I've built eight rocking chairs. I learned from Paul Sellers at Homestead Heritage. Using his designs, which I find to be incredibly comfortable, I make the seat about 16" above the floor and the arms about 8" above the seat. The proportions on the subject design appear extreme to me. I suspect it may not be comfortable to sit in.

    I really would not know without sitting in the chair. The dimensions on the chair are not known. I really can't judge the chair without sitting in it.
    Last edited by lowell holmes; 07-25-2016 at 6:49 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Houston, Texas area
    Posts
    1,308
    Maybe the builder plans for a 4" cushion on the bottom...
    Mark McFarlane

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Virginia and Kentucky
    Posts
    3,364
    It was a nice looking chair for sale, but in the long run I passed. It seemed more of a conversation piece than practical. A cushion would have helped but the seller indicated it was very delicate.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    A suburb of Los Angeles California
    Posts
    644
    That looks tippy (side-to-side) in the rocked-back position. Visually it's intriguing though...
    AKA - "The human termite"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    2,667
    Top looks traditional, while bottom looks modern. Doesn't fit together well in my opinion.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Dickinson, Texas
    Posts
    7,655
    Blog Entries
    1
    brocker1.jpgcrocker1.jpg

    Here are chairs I find to be very attractive. Of course, they are Paul Sellers designs.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Virginia and Kentucky
    Posts
    3,364
    Quote Originally Posted by lowell holmes View Post
    brocker1.jpgcrocker1.jpg

    Here are chairs I find to be very attractive. Of course, they are Paul Sellers designs.
    I like both of those quite a bit. The one on the right has a mission/craftsman sort of look.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •