Originally Posted by
mark mcfarlane
Testing the loudness of a device in an anechoic chamber is a fairly standard practice. I suspect that is what the Laguna rep meant when he said 'sound proof room'. The test room eliminates reflected energy, which would make measurements from different vendors incomparable if they all tested in a different kind of room.
I seriously doubt Laguna booked time for anechoic room measurements. As I have said before SPL levels for machines are useless unless all the factors including distance, weighting and space factors are disclosed. Since most of the machines we buy don't have to meet any industry regulations or standards for sound emissions we are somewhat stuck. If any manufacturer touts a SPL 3-4dB lower (or more) than similar competing machines list it is likely not comparable. As far as cyclones go if you want any significant sound reduction they have to be physically isolated from the work area.
Laguna could have worked backwards from the acoustic load that the DC was measured in to produce the 4pi steradians loading of a anechoic chamber but that is just dumb since a DC is never going to be floating in space. The problem for sound is many cyclones or placed in a corner with the motor/blower very close to three intersecting walls thus pi/2 steradians (or eighth space) which really reinforces the sound. I noticed Laguna used egg crate "acoustic" foam, I need to do a spectral analysis of the sound from a cyclone but my guess is the absorption coefficient of the egg crate foam is poor in the portions of the spectrum cyclones create.
Of all the laws Brandolini's may be the most universally true.
Deep thought for the day:
Your bandsaw weighs more when you leave the spring compressed instead of relieving the tension.