Hi, I am hoping anyone can help me identify these 4 pieces of wood. Thanks in advance.
Wood 1:
IMG_0439.jpg
Wood 2:
IMG_0441.jpg
Wood 3:
IMG_0443.jpg
Wood 4:
IMG_0445.jpg
Hi, I am hoping anyone can help me identify these 4 pieces of wood. Thanks in advance.
Wood 1:
IMG_0439.jpg
Wood 2:
IMG_0441.jpg
Wood 3:
IMG_0443.jpg
Wood 4:
IMG_0445.jpg
Teak, oak, butternut, spanish cedar
The first one doesn't look like teak.
Looks like it may be sassafras. If it is you will know it by the smell when you saw into it'
The first two look like red oak, the second two look like black walnut sapwood.
Lee Schierer
USNA '71
Go Navy!
My advice, comments and suggestions are free, but it costs money to run the site. If you found something of value here please give a little something back by becoming a contributor! Please Contribute
Thanks guys for the help. I did some more research and took small cuts off of each of the pieces of wood. #2 is defiantly oak and #4 is defiantly Spanish cedar. The smell was a dead giveaway on both of them when I cut into them. The #1 did not have a sassafras or teak smell when I cut into it and its end grain does not look like sassafras or teak according to the wood-database.com website. The #3 one looks almost identical to the first one from an end grain point of view. It did not have any smell either when I cut into it. I am starting to think both are butternut where the #1 is quartersawn and the #3 is flat sawn. This picture is the end grain of the 1st and 3rd woods next to each other. Any other ideas? Thanks!
I sanded these on my disk sander so there are still sanding scratches in them vertically.
thin butternut.jpg
Bump. Any ideas? Thanks.
I would say #1 is Tasmanian Oak and #3 is Tasmanian Blackwood but I don't know how likely this is. Neither are strongly scented. Cheers
I would be surprised if #1 wasnt teak. The sap/pitch streaking in the upper left is a very common feature of teak. It it oily or greasy feeling at all? Does it change color in less than a day when freshly cut, when exposed to light? Teak is very light reactive.
At first I thought #1 was teak but it has no oily or greasy feel and does not have that smell when you cut it like other teak I have worked with. I did not notice any color changes but can try testing that out as well. It just seems to be missing that golden color alternating with a white/creamy color vs real teak I have worked with and the pour structure on the end grain. Thanks guys!
Chris,
The top one has distinct chains of pores not present in butternut. I've seen this before but don't remember the species with this characteristic. If I can find time I'll try to check my references. Hoadley's book "Identifying Wood" is also a great resource. The bottom one is much different and even with the sanding damage appears to be strongly ring porous rather than diffuese porous as typical of butternut:
butternut-endgrain-zoom.jpg
Did you try using a razor blade or very sharp edge of a chisel or knife to get a clear look at the end grain? It only needs to be a small sample. If the wood is too hard a piece can be soaked in water first.
Near the bottom of the wood ID article of the Wood Database tells how to get free professional wood ID from the US government. They will ID up to five sample per year for any citizen.
JKJ