I personally would go with Mike's suggestion. My front door is vertical grain fir. I would never laminate an exterior door. But, that's just me.
A pro friend of mine has built hundreds and hundreds of exterior doors over the past 25 years using laminated construction, and ships them all over the country. Not one has failed. That is proof enough to me that it is reliable.
John
I don't think the issue is whether stave core or laminated doors will fail- they won't- but rather if someone new to making doors, maybe new to resawing and veneering skins for the core, and glueing the solid edges, will gain enough benefit for the extra work. I don't know the experience of the OP but first doors are never as easy as the last. Quality dried and carefully chosen solid will hold up in a Northern climate protected and little used. Either method will likely outlast most of us. The sun has caused more door maintenance issues in my life than the number of laminations. Dave
No matter what method is picked, failure starts WHEN water gets in. And unless it is very well protected, water ALWAYS gets in. Just a question of time.
I have in the back room of my shop, a set of turn of the century doors that were stave core construction. I keep them because they are a nice design, I like to look at and study old methods, and because water got to them, and they failed. 1/4" veneer faces just peeling off, and staves behind separated at all the glue joints.
Came out of a very nice brownstone in Boston.
I replaced with solid, about 10 years ago.
Only about another 70 years to go to see which lasted longer.
Glue joints fail with moisture cycling, or the glue/wood interface zone. Less joints, and less moisture= less failure
Protect your door, whatever method you choose.
I've had to make doors to replace some older ones that were early stave core. Did seem they were failing from moisture. Was surprised they attempted that with old type glue. Haven't seen any failures with modern glues except on doors that did not have paint or varnish on top and bottom. We started putting large stickers on our doors saying all waranty claims would be void if top and bottom rail edges were not painted. I've seen no failures on doors made even with just "water resistant" glues that were well sealed on all surfaces. Have seen a bunch of mahogany doors get painted just several years out due to finish getting shabby.
Depending on the stability of the wood chosen, I'd probably go solid, but if using a core, choose wisely.
I do a fair amount of work on wood boats. WWII introduced hot laminated (autoclaves) plywoods which were used extensively on boats generally smaller in size. Generally the approach was outside skins of the best quality materials (various mahogany ... best being Honduran) and then cores of either cheaper grades of Mahogany or sometimes secondary woods such as poplar. Laminations were glued and then stapled before being pushed into the autoclave to activate the glue with heat and applied pressure.
Fifty years later we get to see how those different laminations held up ... and let me tell you ... it's not always pretty! I have seen hulls that look perfect from the outside and yet the interior core of poplar is virtually gone. Obviously the hull is not a worthwhile restoration candidate. Hulls of Honduran Mahogany are sometimes as beautiful and stiff as the day they left the factory. What we refer to as Philippine Mahogany performs variably. Remarkably, the heat activated glues from fifty years ago hold up remarkably well. A door is not a boat, but the lesson is, choose the core wisely.
"the mechanic that would perfect his work must first sharpen his tools.” Confucius
My front door was made by Peter Gillighan many years ago (probably circa 1992?) and long before we bought the house. It is Honduras Mahogany over some kind of MDF core. It is well protected from the weather by a long overhang and the fact that it faces away from prevailing winds. Every few years I put a little oil on it and it looks brand new - we have low humidty, but temperatures range from below -40 C to above 34C.
One note about Honduras mahogany: it is quite soft. This makes it easy to work with, but bad for heavy use applications like a door in a busy business or office. I've been using Santos Mahogany for interior stuff (e.g. stair headers, bathroom cabinets): it's cheaper, harder, easier to get, and very similar in color.
old guy made multi core doors that had to last 300 years. Another reason for stave besides stability is you can make any thickness you want. I wrinkled my nose when he said 300 years and he said go to Europe and look at Churches and Cathedrals. Some of the church doors were up to six inches thick with cores running in different layers he drew it once and I didint get it. He got belted once doing a door and making a short cut. He did city Hall here and the doors were designed by engineers with threaded rods and stuff. He told it wont last and he would not do it, he built them as they did in Europe and put a 25 year warranty on them. The owners of the company flipped out that he put any warranty on them.
I havent done big doors and do small ones as he did One thing comes to mind when you talk 1/4" outside veneer its going to fall on the profile somewhere. He said they tried to put the face into a certian place in the profile where it would not show much. Id think thicker would be better for a few reasons if you can get it out of the material you are starting with. 4/4 now isnt what it was in the past. pretty sure his usual outside thickness was 3/8". I had a church door cross section I cant find and last time he stopped by did a fast drawing of a 2 1/4 door, he saw a door here i took ouit of the garbadge of a company that closed and it just perked him up right away.