Originally Posted by
John Keeton
Bill, folks use a lot of terms interchangeably. I prefer to use "grain" to refer to the direction of growth, evidenced by pores and growth rings with alternating hard and soft wood. Figure, on the other hand, is usually referred to as the undulating grain in certain pieces that when cut creates chatoyance. This occurs because by cutting across the "waves" one exposes alternating long grain and end grain. Often, this is referred to as curly, tiger, quilted, etc. You have some of that in your walnut. IMO, if one wants to preserve chatoyance, then oil is avoided. However, using oil will enhance the contrast of the undulating grain by darkening the end grain because it will soak up more of the finish/oil than will the long grain.
Wood can also have color created by spalting or fungus, mineral streaks, Ambrosia beetles, and other insects. Often streaks of color are just a part of the naturally occurring coloration in certain woods. I hear people refer to this as "grain" or "figure", but I typically do not associate those terms with color.
So.... if what you are wanting is "deep figure" then you need to decide between the chatoyance or the contrast created by an oil finish. For me, I like the contrast moreso than the chatoyance, but that is my personal preference. To that end, I would do just what you are doing.
For "killer gloss" one must have both a flat, smooth surface and closed pores. Wet sanding with the oil finish will go a long way toward filling the pores, especially if you will push the slurry into the pores by wiping it across the grain and letting the finish set some between grits. Then, it is going to take multiple coats of finish, applied carefully, with wet sanding of the finish a couple of times along the way, and for me, just prior to buffing.