Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: timber post lamination/glue pressure

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    531

    timber post lamination/glue pressure

    I have a job coming up where I need to glue 5 pieces of 19mm thick x 14cm x 180cm timber to form a timber post with cross sectional area of 140mm x 95mm, 1800mm long.

    They are all flatsawn so therefore 10kg/cm2 (150psi) should suffice?

    14 x 180 = 2520cm2 x 10kg/cm2 = 25200 kg

    I have a pneumatic table but the ram can only exert 4000N at 0.8mpa each, thats roughtly 400kg, there are 6 rams, therefore 2400kg.

    it seems I have to use my T bar clamps(1500kg capacity) or my Urko clamps (1800kg capacity)

    thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    10,323
    The usual woodworking glues (for instance Titebond) do not care how much pressure is applied to them. A blob of Titebond will eventually dry when it is just sitting out in the open. Clamps are used to pull the workpieces together so the glue line is thinner, and to force excess glue to squeeze out the sides. If your timbers are machined flat, you don't need much force from the clamps. My usual practice is to mill the joint properly, spread a thin layer of glue on the joint, and apply clamping pressure until I'm seeing good squeeze-out. If I apply more force, nothing changes. So that extra force isn't needed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    868
    Is this post a structural member?

    If so, you need to chose a glue rated for structural use. I seem to remember that glues like the Titebond series are not recommended for structural applications.

    Just a thought...
    Too much to do...Not enough time...life is too short!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    2,162
    Just clamp it enough to close the joints and get squeeze out. Also make sure you apply the glue to the entire surface ie brush or scrape it on uniformly. If this is just a post, any decent glue including titebond is Ok. It's just vertical lamination and that works structurally even if just nailed together to code. If it is a beam, then you need a structural glue such as resorcinol or epoxy. Titebonds are not structural as Bill pointed out. Cheers

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Shoreline, CT
    Posts
    2,923
    There is plenty of evidence that PVA glues such as Titebond give strongest bonds when clamped with substantial pressure. Published research has demonstrated that increasing pressure until just short of deforming the wood increases strength. Basically, you can't over clamp such a glue joint. Glues such as epoxy have different requirements and tolerate thicker glue hunts.

  6. #6
    It's true PVA s are not rated structural ,it's an expensive process. So it's a market positioning thing. But many of us have run our own tests,wearing hard hats and found them sound.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    531
    Thanks All.

    Its not a "structural" item however its the post for a bunk bed. so in a way it is a structural element.

    I think I will stick with 150psi for flatsawn and just PVA.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Leland, NC
    Posts
    476
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Schoene View Post
    There is plenty of evidence that PVA glues such as Titebond give strongest bonds when clamped with substantial pressure. Published research has demonstrated that increasing pressure until just short of deforming the wood increases strength. Basically, you can't over clamp such a glue joint. Glues such as epoxy have different requirements and tolerate thicker glue hunts.
    So what is "substantial" ???? And what about that "deforming"??? Is that deforming the wood under the clamp head or the entire glue surface?

    If this "research" is published, who published it? Please give a reference.

    I am challenging you on this because you made statements without giving any references.

    Edit: I have seen an article in FWW with a Dr Rabiej that agrees with what you wrote. But a Google search indicates there are lots and lots of other "experts" that disagree with him.

    I would be interested in reading this "research".
    Last edited by Ted Reischl; 06-08-2017 at 4:41 PM.

  9. #9
    Ted , the tech reps at Titebond say they have never seen a glue joint that was "glue starved" from over clamping . But obviously the project can suffer from damage to the wood from too much pressure.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    2,162
    Pva as a generic category of glue is not structural according to our building code. Epoxy and resorcinol are. I tend to go with the code writers on this one. Cheers

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Leland, NC
    Posts
    476
    A post for a bunk bed? I would not worry about fussy pressure settings.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •