Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Oneida 'Super Dust Deputy' vs 'Super Dust Deputy XL' for system with 6" duct

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    130

    Oneida 'Super Dust Deputy' vs 'Super Dust Deputy XL' for system with 6" duct

    I just finished running all the 6" duct work in my shop, and as I look at these two cyclones, the larger is rated for 3-5hp blowers, and the smaller for 1-3hp. Mine is a 2hp. I don't ever see going above 3. So, the smaller cyclone should work.

    Problem is, it has a 5" inlet and a 6" outlet, whereas the XL has a 6" in and 6" out. I really don't want to constrict down to 5", but I would have to pay an additional $70 or so just to have a 6" inlet. That seems crazy.

    I considered buying the smaller one and modifying it, but at the moment I am cringing at that thought.

    Any suggestions?

    DW

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Birmingham, MI
    Posts
    148
    Dustin,

    Several people have been in your situation. Actually it is the CFM not HP that is the requirement for the larger SDD XL (min 850). With a 2 HP and all your pipe and filter SP you will be below the minimum. So the larger should not even be considered because it will not perform correctly (oh it may work but not efficiently). Also, with your size unit, 5" ducts would probably have been a better choice but then you would have to use metal duct. All that being said, others have used 6" duct off a 5" SDD without issue (so far). Your challenge will be to keep the velocity high enough to keep everything moving through the ducts and not drop in the duct and create clogs.

    Sorry I couldn't give you a better answer. Hope that helps, let us know what you do.

    Carl

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    130
    thanks, Carl. I actually used 6" and it is metal, not pvc. I only went with 6" because the research I did lead me in that direction...

  4. #4
    Do not cut the 6" down to 5" at the cyclone inlet, that will slow down the cfm's and could leave a buildup of dust in your ductwork. I had a 6" system with a 2hp cyclone, and it worked ok, just works better with a 3hp blower.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    130
    so you think I should spend the extra 70 for the 6" port? or try to modify the smaller unit?

    In your system with 6" duct and a 2hp unit, were there any issues you ran into with it?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Birmingham, MI
    Posts
    148
    Dustin,

    Just to clarify, you are not buying a 6" port you are buying a significantly larger cyclone. The XL is ~10" taller and several inches bigger in diameter. You will be short on the minimum CFM/velocity to effectively create a cyclone in the XL (it won't separate well - i.e. clogged filters). I would not even consider the XL unless you plan to use a different blower. To increase the flow through your current DC:

    1) Are you venting outside? That will help. If not 2 cartridge filters are better than one to increase airflow.
    2) What kind of 2HP DC are you starting with? If it is HF it underperforms most all 1.5HP DCs due to the small 10" impeller (an impeller upgrade Rikon 12")
    3) Are you planning to put the blower right on the SDD vs. running hard/flex pipe from DC

    The above are ways to significantly increase your flow. Following that the options I see are :

    1) Try the SDD with the 5" port and 6" ducts, as others have done and see how it works (others have tried this but, smaller different runs, off of different machines will give different results - your clogs may vary)
    2) Upgrade your blower to at least a 3HP and then get the XL
    3) Keep your blower, get the SDD and change your duct to 5"

    Again not what you want to hear but I can't change physics.

    Hope that helps. Let us know what you do.

    Carl

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    130
    Carl,

    this makes sense. I am not venting outside. I am using a HF collector and plan on upgrading the impeller. The blower will mount directly to the cyclone. It sounds like, I hate to say it, I need to tear down my system and return whatever 6" ducting I can to make the system 5". I will try the setup as-is first, but man, this will be really disappointing if I need to essentially re-do the system.

    I know I will eventually come across a 3hp 3ph motor cheap enough that I can use, but assuming I use the rikon impeller, will increasing the motor size and using the same blower housing show any notable difference? I would guess that the blower housing itself is at its cfm limitation.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Birmingham, MI
    Posts
    148
    Dustin,

    Yes the impeller upgrade will make a significant difference. If you search for it a guy measured his before and after and I think it went from ~370 CFM to over 600 CFM. Now this is not very accurate as it was a handheld meter but it gives you an idea of improvement. There are many variables from one setup to another, so you may be surprised by the velocity of the machine. Everyone talks about 6" and needing X CFM to maintain material airborne but that is based on the correlating velocity of 4000-4500 FPM. If the velocity is higher the CFM increases. So the more efficient you make your system: little to no flex pipe, long radius turns, short runs (run down the middle of shop and drop to the tool, not around the walls), clean large surface area filters (200-500sq-ft), etc the less the restrictions and the higher the velocity.

    Hope that helps. Let us know what you do.

    Carl

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    2,203

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    130
    The guy in the video is using the XL, and my exact model collector. I wonder if he is having issues with the cyclone working properly.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Birmingham, MI
    Posts
    148
    Yeah, I saw that when it first came out and wondered if Oneida knew what he was going to do with the XL when they gave it to him since it contradicts what they say about the XL. This is one of the many variables with dust collection, what kind of dust are you using. This is where a lot of subjectivity comes to play. Two people using the same system but with different tools will have different results. How they measure will differ as well. Running heavier course dust through that will probably work OK. Run finer dust from a sander our router, or MDF dust and you see performance drop. To really check you need to season the filter, then clean it, then run 20-40 gallons of dust through and then clean the filter again to see how much bypassed. Most people run a couple of gallons of mainly course dust through a clean filter and when nothing shows up in the bypass they think it works awesome.

    It would be interesting to see what you find out from him months later about performance and the kind of machines he uses.

    Carl

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    2,203
    Quote Originally Posted by dustin wassner View Post
    The guy in the video is using the XL, and my exact model collector. I wonder if he is having issues with the cyclone working properly.
    You can ask Brent a question on the tutorial page about the project. He's super nice and pretty good about responding to posts.

    I have the HF blower, 12" impeller and the SDD with 5" spiral pipe. The run is pretty short and mine vents outside but the performance has been good.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Berwick, Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    425
    Don't overthink it. I am running a 2hp with the original SDD. 6" to 5" reducer at inlet to SDD, 6" mains. Among other tools, 20" planer, 8" jointer, 6" X 89" edge sander, table saw etc. Chips and dust pull right through. NO build up in pipes, not even on the screws holding the pipe joints. Does it meet the "Penz" standard? No, but I would rather have some tools and "good enough" dust collection than "Penz" standard collection and no tools, as I can't afford both, and I am not allergic or have feeble lungs.
    Mike

  14. #14
    Hope you don’t mind me piggybacking this thread Dustin. I have a similar question but with a different configuration.


    I am also adding a Super Dust Deputy to my DC system.
    I have a BusyBee system with the following specs: 240volt, 3HP, 13 amp, Impeller size – 12”, Static Pressure – 18.5”, Air suction capacity – 2,300 CFM (I think this may be a little optimistic),
    inlet cover 8” with a split adapter to three 4” inlets
    Bag Sizes – Upper – 19” x 32”, Filters Air to 1 Micron
    I have no ducting in place and use a 25 ft 4” flex on one 4” port

    For now I was think of removing the three 4” split adapter from my DC then reduce the DC 8” opening to 6”, run a single 6” pipe to the dust Deputy outlet and also reduce dust deputy inlet to my 4” flex hose.

    With the above scenario, would you use the Oneida AXD002030A or the XL version

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    3,086
    I think people are being over optimistic about there dust collectors. With that Busy Bee dust collector you will be lucky to get half of the 2300 cfm. I can not get 2300 with 5 hp and 15" impeller.

    People need to be a bit more realistic about their dust collector performance and the effects of the DD.

    Good luck

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •