Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Thickness of rails on box joint jig

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Eastern Oregon
    Posts
    367

    Thickness of rails on box joint jig

    I have built a few box joint jigs and always had the bottom of the jig slide on the table top. Need to build a new one and wondered how it would work to make the rails a bit thicker so they carried the weight of the sled rather than the sled bottom (Cast iron top) Less drag? What's your thoughts?
    Dick

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Modesto, CA, USA
    Posts
    9,885
    Then the plywood will have to be perfectly flat with no bow. The plywood will have to be twice as thick or more so it does not bow down in the middle as you push it along. a few thousandths of bow would make the joint fit poorly.
    You can always wax the bottom of the plywood, even groove it to reduce friction.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, ON Canada
    Posts
    1,468
    If I understand your question, the bottom the jig would not touch the top of your table saw. Only the runners that slide in the table saw tracks would be in contact with the table saw. Is this correct?

    The theoretical downside that I can see is you are depending on the bottom of the table saw slots to be smooth and completely parallel to the top of the table saw. Generally, in building jigs that use runners in the table saw slots, we make sure that the runner does not touch the bottom of the slot. (I'm sure that's been your practice to date.) This ensures that the weight of the jig is spread out over the entire base of the jig and that it is sliding on the smooth table saw top.

    On my saw, for example, the bottom of the slots is pretty rough. It causes me no grief as I don't have any jigs that register against it. If I were to try your idea, I believe that I would encounter more resistance, not less, since the slots are not polished.

    Not having tried this, Dick, I'm only speculating. If you try it, I would be interested to read your results.
    Grant
    Ottawa ON

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Bedford, NH
    Posts
    1,286
    Quote Originally Posted by Grant Wilkinson View Post
    If I understand your question, the bottom the jig would not touch the top of your table saw. Only the runners that slide in the table saw tracks would be in contact with the table saw. Is this correct?

    The theoretical downside that I can see is you are depending on the bottom of the table saw slots to be smooth and completely parallel to the top of the table saw. Generally, in building jigs that use runners in the table saw slots, we make sure that the runner does not touch the bottom of the slot. (I'm sure that's been your practice to date.) This ensures that the weight of the jig is spread out over the entire base of the jig and that it is sliding on the smooth table saw top.

    On my saw, for example, the bottom of the slots is pretty rough. It causes me no grief as I don't have any jigs that register against it. If I were to try your idea, I believe that I would encounter more resistance, not less, since the slots are not polished.

    Not having tried this, Dick, I'm only speculating. If you try it, I would be interested to read your results.


    My thoughts as well.
    Thoughts entering one's mind need not exit one's mouth!
    As I age my memory fades .... and that's a load off my mind!

    "We Live In The Land Of The Free, Only Because Of The Brave"
    “The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."
    "
    Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    22,493
    Blog Entries
    1
    I like the base supported by the saw. If your saw top isn't slippery, I would fix that rather than design a heavier jig.
    "A hen is only an egg's way of making another egg".


    – Samuel Butler

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Bedford, NH
    Posts
    1,286
    Quote Originally Posted by glenn bradley View Post
    I like the base supported by the saw. If your saw top isn't slippery, I would fix that rather than design a heavier jig.


    Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum =
    Garbage in, garbage out. Obviously not applicable to Glenn. VIVO would be more appropriate!
    Thoughts entering one's mind need not exit one's mouth!
    As I age my memory fades .... and that's a load off my mind!

    "We Live In The Land Of The Free, Only Because Of The Brave"
    “The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."
    "
    Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Central North Carolina
    Posts
    1,830
    A good coat of Johnsons Paste Wax on the table saw top will make a huge difference. I re-wax my tool tables before each project, and sometimes again during projects. It not only keeps my cast iron from rusting, but makes things slide easier over them.

    Charley

  8. #8
    Dick, when I built my BJ jig I took a garage sale miter guage, set the angle to an accurate 90 degrees, and locked it there by drilling and inserting a steel pin (permanently) The BJ jig is bolted to the face of the miter guage. That way, the material being cut rides directly on the TS surface.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •