Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: The right tool really does make all the difference

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,441
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie Simpson View Post
    Traditional wedge abutment planes rarely rate a mention on this forum.
    Mostly any item on this forum is mentioned as often as one shows up in someone's tool kit or someone finds one hunting rust.

    In my neck of the woods the very few traditional wedge abutment planes to come across my path were not restorable.

    However some of my shelves and a few boxes are full of wooden molding planes.

    When it the time comes to build my own it will first be spent on building planes that do not already reside in my kit.

    jtk
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  2. #17
    I made a 16 inch jack (fore) plane in 1978 and I still use it for all roughing. There is little danger of a sole wearing out in a lifetime of use. I prefer a jack plane to a scrub plane because the hands are farther apart which makes it easier to control, more leverage or greater moment. Using a scrub plane is like having a little steering wheel on a truck.

    The term "scrub" was coined by Stanley tools around 1890. It was a short iron plane with a narrow curved iron. The English and American tradition used the longer planes. The terms jack and fore have been used somewhat interchangeably for more than three centuries.

    The French used a short, horned plane called a rifflard. This plane is mentioned by Felibien (1667) for use when the wood is "bad", but he does not illustrate it along with the other planes. Roubo (1769) does not mention or illustrate this tool at all in his multi volume work. Diderot mentions the rifflard in the Encyclopedia, but does not illustrate it with other planes.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,211
    Quote Originally Posted by Warren Mickley View Post
    I made a 16 inch jack (fore) plane in 1978 and I still use it for all roughing.
    My stanley scrub gets a lot less use since I found a wooden jack. It is a lot better for roughing than the Stanley No. 5 that I have. The scrub can take deeper cuts, but the jack does very well.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati Ohio
    Posts
    4,734
    My Scrub Plane I found at an antique store not too long ago.
    Have not got a chance to tune it up and use.

    scrub plane (3).jpgscrub plane (5).jpg
    "Remember back in the day, when things were made by hand, and people took pride in their work?"
    - Rick Dale

  5. I have had various planes set up to scrub- a coffin smoother, a #4, a #5. I got a Stanley #40 recently in a box of rusty tools. Much better.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Lehnert View Post
    My Scrub Plane I found at an antique store not too long ago.
    Have not got a chance to tune it up and use.

    scrub plane (3).jpgscrub plane (5).jpg
    That's the same basic pattern as the ECE that was the subject of this thread. Should work nicely if all is in proper order (can't really tell from the pix, but's it's a pretty low bar for a scrub in any case).

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Ramona, CA by way of Phliadelphia
    Posts
    270
    Here's my contribution, found at the "Swamp Meat". Seems to work well right out of the box so to speak. Cant make out the iron makers mark "K E M SCH" with BEST on the bottom.
    rick
    IMG_3087.jpg IMG_3088.jpg IMG_3089.jpgIMG_3091.jpg

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •