Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 71

Thread: Japanese vs Western vs Chinese tools- can someone comment on strengths/weakness?

  1. #1

    Japanese vs Western vs Chinese tools- can someone comment on strengths/weakness?

    I'm pretty new to the Neanderthal thing, and have been slowly learning through trial an error.

    I've found that Japanese vs Western vs Chinese tools- have various pros and cons. But I'm not sure if I'm wrong?

    I'd like your insights.



    Here's mine:
    - Japanese
    Great blades, sharp, high performance, closer feel to the wood
    Technique sensitive, expensive, high maintenance (unstable soles)
    Imho, the saws make most sense in pulling on tension-- especially joiners saws.

    - Western
    Okay blades (hock, LN, LV). Sharp. Good to high performance. Less maintenance due to metal bodies
    Con- finicky setup sometimes (older Stanley combo planes). Many newer manufacturer s have poor quality (groz, Stanley)
    My understanding is Western spokeshave is superior to Japanese version.

  2. #2
    I'm a novice with Japanese tools, but I'll tell you what I've seen so far, as a starting point.

    Japanese saws cut on the pull stroke and people usually pull their planes. Western saws and planes are the opposite. I dont know of any pros/cons here - my guess is it's a "what you're used to" thing. Both certainly work.

    My Dozuki saws have no "set" and the teeth are impulse hardened. The pro is that the kerf is very small and the saw stays sharp a long time. The con is that I don't think they are readily sharpenable. You replace the blade. (There may be higher quality saws that are sharpenable - I dont know.)

    A big pro for me is that my Dozuki saws are great for fine work and small parts. I think that's because the tooth count is high, plus the lack of "set".

  3. #3
    I would hesitate to claim actual sharpness is superior in one or the other. Hardness, brittleness, sharpenabilty, etc. often differ between the western and Japanese chisels and planes (can't speak for current Chinese metallurgy), but the level of sharpness can be achieved with either. It is often an issue of whether you tend to work a lot of very hard woods or not whether one functions better or not, but the same can be said even for the many different "western" tool metals.


    I definitely find it is worth having a small kit of Japanese saws regardless, and I find the Japanese saws function extremely well in certain cases for me like flush and trim cuts and very fine work, but I really like my western saws for most things and I seem to keep the cut true more easily. I have no experience with Japanese planes. I like my PM-V11 chisels and can't imagine much difference in function between good western and good eastern chisels.
    Last edited by Noah Magnuson; 10-14-2017 at 6:04 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,347
    Blog Entries
    1
    Howdy Matt,

    - Japanese
    My understanding is the Japanese include more of their personal philosophy in their woodworking. One example is of pulling their tools instead of pushing their tools. The way it was explained to me is cutting the wood removes some of the spirit of the wood. The use of a pull stroke of saws and planes is intended to direct this spirit into the worker so the spirit may reside in them and expand their spiritual being.

    One of my preferences in hand tools is that it feels comfortable in my hand. Most hooped chisels are not comfortable for me. This is especially true when paring if the top of the chisel is mashed over from hammer blows.

    My Japanese pull saws still see some use but my sawing with western saws has become much better. To me the thinness of the pull saw blades requires a bit more discipline to keep to the line.

    - Western
    There is something available in almost any price range. Of course on the low end of the price scale one is either buying poor quality (also available at higher prices) or one has to do a bit of fettling (again something that may be required on a higher priced item).

    Are there new Japanese combo planes? Is this possibly a comparison of things that do not actually compare?

    A Japanese plane hasn't yet made it into my shop or hands. Are they less finicky to set up than a western wooden plane? Once one of my bench planes is set up, it stays how it was set until the next time the blade needs some work. My LN #62 had a nick in the blade recently. It took more time to give it a light grinding and honing than it did to get it back to work.
    My planes are mostly Stanley. They were plentiful when my first planes were bought and it was my decision to keep to one maker for better part interchangeability.

    As said above, my comfort factor when using a tool is important. This is why most of my chisels are socket chisels. It is easy to make my own handle for a socket chisel.

    Our feelings about our craft and the tools we use is different for each of us. It is good to investigate different avenues to the same destination. Find what feels good to you and stay with it.

    jtk
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Lau View Post
    I'm pretty new to the Neanderthal thing, and have been slowly learning through trial an error.

    I've found that Japanese vs Western vs Chinese tools- have various pros and cons. But I'm not sure if I'm wrong?
    I think that you're making the mistake of trying to "objectify" what are at heart very subjective preferences.

    Take for example your remark that Japanese "saws make the most sense in pulling on tension". I know a lot of people (including myself) who have a strong subjective preference for sawing on the push stroke. It's probably worth noting that basically all saw traditions started out cutting on the pull stroke.

    Just pick what works for you, but don't waste time trying to convince yourself or anybody else that it's "best" or even that it has specific objective strengths. That's a fool's errand.
    Last edited by Patrick Chase; 10-14-2017 at 7:22 PM.

  6. #6
    One thing I like about Japanese saws is that they make it possible to cut some things with the piece flat on the bench instead of held vertically in a vise. You don't have to, but on some things it can be convenient.

    while there are differences in make, style, and feel in western vs Japanese tools, I don't think one offers an easier path to superior work. The choice imho is entirely personal.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    The OPs proposition that all western planes have metal bodies is a misnomer.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,467
    Matt, the factors that first comes to my mind is design (and design philosophy), use, and maintenance. The Japanese and Western tools are almost diametrically opposite in most respects.

    First off, in my opinion Japanese tools are about as sophisticated as could be, and light years ahead of Western equivalents. My experience with Chinese designs is more limited, and so - design-wise- they might be inbetween.

    Japanese saws are, as you know, designed to be pulled. This way the plates remain in tension, which is necessary as they are very thin. Their teeth can be made very small and high in number which, with the minimal set, allows them to leave a finish quite unmatched by anything the West has to offer (and at a comparable price). The downside is that the saws are fragile and not for the heavy-handed. Western saws are made to be used roughly (I am not suggesting this!). Their thicker plates are needed as they are pushed instead. Larger teeth and more set equate to a rougher finish (I have filed saws with teeth to 20 tpi and set then accordingly, but the finish is no where in the same class).

    It is possible to purchase Japanese saws quite cheaply with a performance that is simply superb. I am very happy with the Z-saw range. The downside to these saws is that the teeth are impulse hardened, which means they cannot be sharpened, and instead are replaced. Japanese saws that are sharpenable are possibly do-able by the user (I do not know of anyone who sharpens their own), and more commonly are sent back to Japan to a specialist saw sharpener. This can be both inconvenient and costly. Westen saws are easier to sharpen (larger teeth, more easily available files, and softer steel).

    There is a similar issue with blades for planes and chisels. The laminated blades from Japan, even the cheap end of the range, far out perform their Western cousins. The steel is not fancy - high carbon steel - but the hammerising process orients the grain, they are hardened well above Western blades, and then any tendency to chip is controlled by adding a softer layer (usually cast iron). The solid steel blades of the West are cheaper to construct, and buy, but inevitably lack the edge retention of the Japanese blade. There are Western blades made from steels (such as PM-V11 and M4) that rival the Japanese laminated blade, but they then do not compete with many for ease of sharpening (I'm going to contradict myself in a moment). I have Japanese blades that seem to do the impossible - sharpen easily and hold an edge forever. A solid Western steen hardened to the same level would simply chip.

    The down side of the Japanese blade is the extra care needed in the sharpening process. Being laminated steel, they are not hollow ground (although many will do so - carefully! - without damaging the temper). The blades are also hollowed at the back (to make it easier to keep flat - the steel there is hard and would otherwise be impossible to hone). Plane blades need to be tapped out. Chisels are straight forward - just lap the back. All this looks more daunting than a Western blade. The recommended honing practice is to freehand on a flat bevel face. Again, one can use a honing guide.

    As with Western chisels, the more impact activities (e.g. chopping) requir higher bevel angles. I would not use a Japanese blade below 25 degrees for paring. By comparison with Western blades, as with the saws, Japanese tools deserve more reverance ... but they reward with a higher performance.

    Overall, Western planes and chisels are just easier to set up and use, probably because we are all so used to them. I have minimal experience with Japanese planes. Perhaps Brian will say something about the East-West comparison.

    Chinese? I am not referring to Western tools copied in China. I have a couple of Chinese laminated plane blades. Overall, they are slightly softer than Japanese, but they are really excellent. I have used Chinese planes for years - they resemble the Japanese but are pushed. The most common example is the Mujingfang range. Superb quality for a mass-produced cheapish plane. The original HNT Gordon bench planes are based on the same design.

    Regards from Perth

    Derek

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    7,252
    Blog Entries
    7
    You guys have covered the differences quite well. I use both western and Japanese planes and in practically every other group of tools I use exclusively Japanese tools.

    I think it's important to use both and determine which you prefer. I really enjoy the spirit of Japanese tools, it's nice to know that someone on the other end put their sweat into a hand forged tool. I feel similarly when I use my planes made by David Weaver. I feel a certain kinship in this way, they speak to me through their craft. The more I discover about the tools the more I feel I begin to understand the thought process and considerations that went into their making.
    Bumbling forward into the unknown.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Stone Mountain, GA
    Posts
    751
    My thoughts:

    Saws - The mass-produced Japanese saws (ex. Gyokucho) are amazing for what they cost. They cut very fast and leave a clean finish. The Ryoba type of saw is brilliant, you can do so many tasks with one saw. On the other hand they seem a bit more sensitive to bad technique or too much pressure, and they seem to have a little more propensity for the backside of the cut to wander. A large (say 300mm) ryoba is surprisingly fast at big ripping and crosscutting chores. A smaller (say 240 or 210mm) is a nice tenon/carcass saw.

    Chisels - I like the standard oire-nomi very well, they are ideal bench/chopping chisels in my opinion. I like the short overall length, which makes them very handy and quick to place in a mark (compared to my vintage western socket chisels which tend to have very long blades). So far the edge retention is noticeably better than anything else I have (and most of those are pretty good). I don't find the sharpening too onerous, even using oil stones. It's not much fun to remove knicks, though, especially if you don't resort to a grinder. Same for adjusting bevel angles. But if you can avoid the knicks then they are quite reasonable to sharpen (not much different from any other tool).

    They are pretty expensive, though. The entry level price is roughly on par with Lie-Nielsen, and goes way up from there. At any given price point the fit/finish will be rougher, and the user will have to do more work to get it in shape. The steel should be good though.

    Planes - I haven't had as much luck with kanna. At least, I have not been able to get them to quite match a LN #4 as a smoothing plane. Of course mine aren't high end examples, and with more tuning they still might improve, but it's hard for me to imagine it being worth the effort with as good as the western planes are. One thing I have found is that they excel at hogging off endgrain. They are also nice to use in a shooting board or for shooting long grain edges on the benchtop (the plane grip and pull motion are comfortable, and the wood-on-wood action is nice). The pull motion is easier for some oddball tasks.

    Same pricing situation as with chisels.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Cohen View Post

    First off, in my opinion Japanese tools are about as sophisticated as could be, and light years ahead of Western equivalents.
    You're kidding, right?
    "For me, chairs and chairmaking are a means to an end. My real goal is to spend my days in a quiet, dustless shop doing hand work on an object that is beautiful, useful and fun to make." --Peter Galbert

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    7,252
    Blog Entries
    7
    Robert, than can be true but it depends on the smith. In my experience Konobu and Kunikei are finishing at an incredible level made all the more impressive by the fact that it is done mainly by sen (scraper) and file with the forge black left on the tool in a perfectly uniform fashion.

    It's very hard to compare between the two, becuase western manufactures chisels are just that, manufactured. Manufacturing provides a level of consistency in finish from piece to piece that is more expensive to provide in a handmade item. At the top end the range it is a fairly consistent result.
    Last edited by Brian Holcombe; 10-15-2017 at 3:53 PM.
    Bumbling forward into the unknown.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Voigt View Post
    You're kidding, right?
    Well, now we know what it takes to get Steve to post on SMC :-).

    Seriously, count me as being more on Steve's side on this one in terms of preference, though as I said above I think it's mostly a subjective thing.

    IMO there is one significant objective benefit to Japanese tools that I didn't touch on in my previous post: The Japanese makers didn't debase their mass-market offerings as Western makers like Stanley did, which is why cheap induction-hardened pull saws such as the Z-saws that Derek references wiped the floor with their newly-made Western competitors for quite some time. If you're determined to purchase new equipment and don't have the budget for high-end tools, then IMO the Japanese offerings have some advantages. I think that "great debasement" is what gave the Japanese manufacturers a strong toehold in the Western tool market to begin with.

    Once you get into high-end stuff you have to realize that everybody is using the same materials, and playing within the same laws of physics.
    Last edited by Patrick Chase; 10-15-2017 at 6:01 PM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Holcombe View Post
    Robert, than can be true but it depends on the smith. In my experience Konobu and Kunikei are finishing at an incredible level made all the more impressive by the fact that it is done mainly by sen (scraper) and file with the forge black left on the tool in a perfectly uniform fashion.

    It's very hard to compare between the two, becuase western manufactures chisels are just that, manufactured. Manufacturing provides a level of consistency in finish from piece to piece that is more expensive to provide in a handmade item. At the top end the range it is a fairly consistent result.
    There are a lot of manufactured Japanese tools on the market, even "high-end" ones (cue one of Stan's diatribes about the new generation of toolmakers adopting rikizai here). Unless the OP is willing to allocate "Brian Holcombe money" to his tool budget he's therefore likely to end up with manufactured stuff either way.

    IMO that's not inherently a bad thing, though. There are some very good manufactured tools out there, and IMO the difference between hand-forging and "manufacturing" is rapidly narrowing with the advent of things like PM steels. Why bother pounding the living daylights out of a hunk of metal over a hot forge to refine the grain along one axis when you can buy it processed such that it's similarly refined on all axes?

    Don't get me wrong: I am in awe of both the quality of a lot of the mass-market Japanese "manufactured" stuff (see previous post) and of the enduring Japanese tradition of fine hand-toolmaking. I just want to make sure we're not thinking magically here :-)
    Last edited by Patrick Chase; 10-15-2017 at 6:17 PM.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Chase View Post
    I think that "great debasement" is what gave the Japanese manufacturers a strong toehold in the Western tool market to begin with.
    And cars, and steel and....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •