Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 47

Thread: Performax engineers are knuckleheads.

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Bend IN
    Posts
    1,663
    I think the safest bet and the easiest to reverse is probably changing the clips and wrapping the paper backwards definitely going to happen when my new mesh sandpaper gets here so I will let you guys know how it goes.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central MA
    Posts
    1,588
    Quote Originally Posted by George Bokros View Post
    Didn't give this a thought, but I believe your are likely correct. It would not be as easy as removing an identical size piece from the other edge of the drum as the weight of the metal is not the same all the way through hence the need for weights to balance the drum. Guess this would not be a viable option.

    Take the cut off piece and glue it inside the drum inboard of the cutout. The weight of the glue will offset the lost metal from cutting, the balance will be maintained.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    El Dorado Hills, CA
    Posts
    1,311
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Wooden View Post
    Sorry, I'm teasing and meant no offense

    And there's the problem- someone decides it should 'look' better and the good engineering gets ignored. Too much function is following form these days
    I am also an engineer and am constantly amazed at poor design decisions in products today. I see it where I work also.

    To me, the biggest offenders are cost saving measures. A classic example was a product many years ago that shipped with a floppy disk device driver. A marketing guy got an award for finding a low cost supplier that saved $0.10 per disk. The quality on those disks were so bad that it is amazing that they worked at all. Nearly every customer would then feel the need to make a backup copy using a 3M disk that cost them $1.00 and 5 minutes of extra time.

    I think cutting the notch to give better visibility is a great improvement. I am going to look into adding that feature on my sander.
    Steve

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    SE Kansas City Metro, MO
    Posts
    661
    Unless I missed it elsewhere in the thread, I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the tool specifically made for holding the clamps while replacing the paper.

    jetn98-0060.jpg
    https://www.amazon.com/Jet-JET-98-00.../dp/B00S6YT3PU (probably available cheaper elsewhere)

    I've got one that I use with my Performax 22-44 and it works great; I just changed the paper a few days ago.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Marina del Rey, Ca
    Posts
    1,937
    Quote Originally Posted by John K Jordan View Post
    ...Performax included a special tool with mine to compress the inner clip...
    Quote Originally Posted by andy bessette View Post
    ...Came with the Tuftool...
    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Tippin View Post
    Unless I missed it elsewhere in the thread, I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the tool specifically made for holding the clamps while replacing the paper...
    It was mentioned, but without an image.
    "Anything seems possible when you don't know what you're doing."

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Auburn, WA
    Posts
    135
    Quote Originally Posted by Curt Harms View Post
    You'd also have to consider balance. If you removed metal you'd have to either remove an equal amount of metal from the opposite side or add a weight to the cut area I'd think.
    Curt - I wouldn't expect the balance to be an issue because (1) the wall thickness of the drum in that area is fairly thin, (2) the amount of material to be removed is relatively small, (3) the 5" diameter of the drum is relatively small, (4) the speed of the drum is only 1750 RPM, and (5) the shaft and bearings are quite large, relatively.
    However, thanks for mentioning this possibility -- opposite side drum material removal is a potential fix for this issue.
    If/when I make this revision, I will post the method & results.

    Paul
    Last edited by Paul Stoops; 12-14-2017 at 6:49 PM. Reason: Correct drum diameter

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Marina del Rey, Ca
    Posts
    1,937
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Stoops View Post
    ...the 2.5" diameter of the drum is relatively small...
    The drum is much larger than 2.5"
    "Anything seems possible when you don't know what you're doing."

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    3,970
    I have two of these tools from my 10/20 and 16/32 sanders. I didn't bring them up because I found them to just be a distraction and not worth the effort. I have changed paper so many times that I can do it in about a minute. If you use it a lot, you will get much more efficient at it without redesigning anything.

    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Tippin View Post
    Unless I missed it elsewhere in the thread, I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the tool specifically made for holding the clamps while replacing the paper.

    jetn98-0060.jpg
    https://www.amazon.com/Jet-JET-98-00.../dp/B00S6YT3PU (probably available cheaper elsewhere)

    I've got one that I use with my Performax 22-44 and it works great; I just changed the paper a few days ago.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Central Missouri, U.S.
    Posts
    1,263
    I think they call it the TUF tool, and how it works is beyond me. The photos in the manual are useless.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    E TN, near Knoxville
    Posts
    12,298

    Using the evil tool

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Decker View Post
    I think they call it the TUF tool, and how it works is beyond me. The photos in the manual are useless.
    Nick, I had the same problem at first and agreed with those who said to just throw it away. Shame on the doc people who wrote and illustrated those instructions!

    If you take a little inspection mirror and hold it below the end of the clip you might see there are several holes in the last piece of metal, the part you lift with your finger if not using the tool.

    What worked for me:
    • First, wind the sandpaper strip on the drum
    • Hook the end of the the devilish tool in the end hole in the clip, the one in the outer corner.
    • Pull straight up to lift the lever and compress both springs and open the gripping jaws in the clip.
    • Twist the whole tool while holding it up and the little flat bend in the tool will swing over and rest on the edge of the drum. This will hold the tool in place with the springs compressed (and also pinch the end of the strip).
    • Now, unless you have three hands and didn't allow the sandpaper strip to slip any, lift the tool slightly and pull the strip tight again.
    • Insert the sandpaper in the slot assuring it goes into the jaws as usual.
    • Lift the tool slightly, rotate back to clear the drum and lower to tighten the jaws and tensioner.

    This drove me nuts at first since you can't easily see what you are doing and exactly where to put the hook in the tool. Eventually I took a closer look and figured it out but really, it only takes five seconds to do it without the tool so I never used it again. It may be quite valuable for someone with dexterity or finger strength limitations.

    JKJ

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Ogden, UT
    Posts
    1,700
    Blog Entries
    1
    You can experiment with the balance problem by adding weight (we use clay in our industry) equivalent of what you think you'll remove. You'll have no way to measure anything, but maybe you'll hear / feel something. Maybe rest your hand on one of the pillowblocks?

    36" is a long distance between bearings. You could get some cross coupling. It slow moving though, which is good. Who knows how accurate the OEM was when they balanced these anyway. (especially considering that you add a unknown unbalance every time you add sandpaper)

    --
    I graduated with only a 2.9, but engineers don't get questioned where I work. Bahaha!
    Last edited by andrew whicker; 12-14-2017 at 11:25 AM.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Auburn, WA
    Posts
    135
    Quote Originally Posted by andy bessette View Post
    The drum is much larger than 2.5"
    OOPS! You're right, Andy. I originally wrote the reply using the radius (2.5") and forgot to edit it to 5" when I changed the word to "diameter". Thanks for catching that.

    Paul

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Central Missouri, U.S.
    Posts
    1,263
    JKJ,

    Thanks, I'll take another look at the TUF tool with your explanation in mind. I'm old enough that arthritis in my fingers occasionally rears its ugly head.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Bend IN
    Posts
    1,663
    Des Going a goofy tool that doesn’t work to fix a problem that doesn’t need to exist in the first place is hilarious. I really don’t think there is any need to cut up or change the balance of the drum. I’ll switch Hear clips this weekend if I get time and I’m sure it will work just fine and he ev n better then a cutout rhatcstill has the clip in a hard to access area.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    E TN, near Knoxville
    Posts
    12,298
    Quote Originally Posted by keith micinski View Post
    Des Going a goofy tool that doesn’t work to fix a problem that doesn’t need to exist in the first place is hilarious. I really don’t think there is any need to cut up or change the balance of the drum. I’ll switch Hear clips this weekend if I get time and I’m sure it will work just fine and he ev n better then a cutout rhatcstill has the clip in a hard to access area.
    The photos of each step. Others will be interested in what you discover. And how it works with some use.

    JKJ

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •