Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 1930s J.D. Wallace jointer restored

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Hartland of Michigan
    Posts
    7,628

    1930s J.D. Wallace jointer restored

    I've been working on this for a month or so. It's an 8" short bed.
    Originally had a direct drive motor, but is converted to belt drive. Mainly due to the motor being missing. I removed the original cast top in favor of one made of pine. Added a motor shelf for the Delta 3/4 hp.
    These jointers have a skewed knife head. An early helical design. It leaves a very smooth surface.


    Img_0249.jpg 0901011130a.jpg Img_0254.jpg
    Never, under any circumstances, consume a laxative and sleeping pill, on the same night

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    81
    That looks very nice where did you get it from?

  3. #3
    Outstanding. I wonder if, once upon a time, they may have considered a short-bed jointer somewhat portable?

    How do you sharpen the skewed knives?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Hartland of Michigan
    Posts
    7,628
    I picked it up in Traverse City, Michigan, in pieces. A 250 mile drive, but we were headed north anyway, so it was a side trip.
    Picture from CL ad.



    Wallace called the 4" and 6" jointers "portable". This 8" weighs in at about 300lbs with the base. Even without it, it's about 150.

    After setting the knives in the head by any usual method, you must joint the knives with a stone, while it's running. Otherwise it will leave a slight rise in the center of your work piece.
    Not something for the faint of heart to do.
    The head before cleanup, showing the skewed knives.

    Never, under any circumstances, consume a laxative and sleeping pill, on the same night

  5. #5
    I've heard of using a stone on knives while a unit is running. I never understood how that doesn't destroy the sharp edge.

    If jointing wood eventually leads to dull knives, you'd think jointing a stone would lead you there faster.

    No?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Hartland of Michigan
    Posts
    7,628
    I figured that also. Jointing the knives does flatten the back of the bevel. I used a 180 oilstone first, then a hard Arkansas. Afterwards, you remove the wire edge it leaves on the front of the knives.
    With the skewed head, the outer edges of the knives are about .002" higher than the centers of the arc. If you can live with that, then just leave them alone. Especially if it's going through the planer anyway.
    Never, under any circumstances, consume a laxative and sleeping pill, on the same night

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Myk Rian View Post
    ...the outer edges of the knives are about .002" higher than the centers of the arc. If you can live with that, then just leave them alone...
    Yep, that is what I'd do.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    1,740
    Nice job, Don

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •