![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | SHOP | Donate |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Filling tear out in Walnut
Below is a pic of a table leg I shaped on the router table. I got a couple minor areas of tear out, this one being about the worst. A bit hard to tell from the image, but I'd say at its maximum depth, the defect is maybe 1/16" below the desired level, and about 1/2" wide. I have mixed sawdust with yellow glue in the past to fill some defects, it can work fairly well, depending on the wood. This is my 1st experience with Walnut. Also, at this point, I'm not sure how I'm going to finish the coffee table, which may be a factor. Any suggestions as to the best approach to filling these small defects?
TIA Dan |
|
Ad Sponsored by Google
Ad Sponsored by Google
|
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Epoxy with fine walnut sawdust (like from your ROS)
OR Can't make the leg a bit thinner? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
If your luck is like mine that is probably an outside corner, in plain site ;-) Seeing the scale of the leg would help. If it is of table size, I would be tempted to hand-shape that defect into the line of the leg so that it became visually eliminated.
I know, I know, you'd know that the one leg was different but, depending on the scale of your piece, it could go unnoticed. Any "patch" will probably be more visible than the gently tapering or re-sizing of the leg. My .02.
__________________
"The trained mind does not need a watch. Watches are a confidence trick invented by the Swiss." --Chiun in 'Remo Williams' |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Are you handy with handplanes? A smoother or block plane might be able to blend/minimize the gouge.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ouch! That's more like "chunk out". Have you considered putting a larger bevel on the legs? That way you could remove the damaged areas completely. (Watch your grain direction!)
__________________
David DeCristoforo |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the replies. I think I'd prefer to fill the area, if this is at all possible. My concern is that if I try to simply increase the taper, I'll just end up tearing out further in. Plus, I've already attached the legs to the stretchers, which might complicate reworking them somewhat.
The leg at the point of the damage is ~ 1 3/8" x 1". |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
The only reason that wood is getting ripped up like that is that you are routing into the grain. It's pretty obvious from looking at the wood, what direction the grain is running. Rout with the grain instead of against it and it will cut cleanly. If you want to fill it, that's your call. But there is little chance that it will not be pretty conspicuous .
__________________
David DeCristoforo |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by Dan Mitchell; 11-10-2009 at 1:46 AM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If you fill the chip out with walnut dust and glue and use a stain on the piece you should be able to blend it pretty well. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tearout solution
Dan, a while back I made some kitchen cabinet doors from red oak to match the existing cabinets, I could not find a cutter to match the profile on the door edges so I matched it with 2 router cutters, when I ran the ends of the stiles across the cutter I got extreme tear out
, even tried to do it in 3 light passes=same thing (1.5hp. Jet Shaper has top speed of 9,000rpm.) causing me to re-make the door frames . Creekers gave me the idea that speed could be the problem so I put my PC router in a Bosch router table (Router=24,000 rpm.) and 3 passes came out great !Although this wont solve your existing problem, thought I'd pass it on for future projects. Speed seemed to be the answer. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Is it the edge velocity compared to some time-constant of the wood? Or is it related to how fast the router is moving relative to the wood? (ie, # cuts per linear foot) Matt |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's the edge velocity of the cutter combined with how much each cutting edge takes off the surface. Shaper cutters typically have much larger diameters and more wings than router bits, so are intended to run at lower shaft RPM but the edge velocity is the same or higher than a router bit run at higher RPM. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dan,
I'd take a nice sharp chisel and make a wedge shaped cut to remove the damaged area. Cut a piece of material with the closest grain you can match and cut it oversized on the top. Glue it in place (hide glue) or your choice, allow to dry and then hand shape the profile to match the leg. You will never see it and when you stain and finish, there will be no problems with the color. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
When it's "chunk-out" instead of just chip-out, spend some time looking for the torn out piece! It can be glued back where it came from and reworked.
I've spend considerable time on my hands and knees...looking...and praying!
__________________
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd just sand it out- A climb cut is not dangerous with a router and a bit less then 2" dim.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|