Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Washing machine question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Odon,IN
    Posts
    438

    Washing machine question

    Does anyone know where I can find the specs on a 20 year old washing machine? I want to find out what the capacity is in cu ft. It is dying and my wife wants a larger machine when we buy. I need to know how big this one is so we can know how much bigger the machines are we will look at.

    Frigidaire fws645rbt4

    I tried Frigidaire's sight and a few others but no luck yet.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Mansfield MA
    Posts
    1,372
    I couldn't find anything, but seriously - other than super small models today, I would think any of the current/modern models would have a larger capacity!

    I would highly recommend getting a front-loader....just my $.02
    I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger....then it hit me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Odon,IN
    Posts
    438
    Thanks for looking. I found a couple sites where I could buy any part for it, but no specs. Our present machine says high capacity (or something like that) on the front, so it must have been a large size at the time.

    This is the one I am seriously thinking about.
    http://www.number1appliance.com/wf448aaw.aspx#

    It is rated #1 or near that by several sources. It is also the largest I could find. I know it is bigger than our present one, but I would like to know how much bigger. Our present machine has done a great job, but it is about worn out. My wife has put up with its aggrevating quirks for a long time, and I want to get her something that will make washday a little easier. This one has a steam cycle that will eliminate a lot of stain pretreating.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by David Freed View Post
    I want to find out what the capacity is in cu ft.
    David,

    A measuring tape and a calculator.
    Tub size = ?????
    Tub height = ?????

    3.14 (pi) x radius squared x height

    Measure in feet and decimal feet. As in 26" diameter = 26/12 = 2.167ft
    Divide that by two for radius = 1.08ft
    Dave J
    Forums: Where all too often, logic is the first casualty.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    central PA
    Posts
    1,774
    Dave beat me to it. Pi x r x r x (max ht of water level) minus the agitator volume. A lot of calculating but doable.

    I wonder if the model number is indicative of the cu.ft.? 4.5?

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Moyer View Post
    minus the agitator volume.
    Rick, I think David will find that it is the tub size and not the actual available cu-ft. It will also be the actual tub size and not the water level.

    This is marketing hype remember.
    Dave J
    Forums: Where all too often, logic is the first casualty.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Odon,IN
    Posts
    438
    Thanks for the formulas, but I already know how to do that. I am just not sure about the variables that were mentioned (agitator, how high up to measure on the tub, etc).

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Moyer View Post
    I wonder if the model number is indicative of the cu.ft.? 4.5?
    I doubt that it is. I can tell just by the pictures that the new ones are larger than ours.
    Last edited by David Freed; 10-18-2009 at 9:31 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    2,296
    you might be over thinking it...

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by David Freed View Post
    I am just not sure about the variables that were mentioned (agitator, how high up to measure on the tub, etc).
    was my previous post invisible?
    Dave J
    Forums: Where all too often, logic is the first casualty.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    672
    I purchase a lot of repair parts for washers and dryers from:

    www.RepairClinic.com

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Odon,IN
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Johnson29 View Post
    was my previous post invisible?
    No. I agree with the hype, but I am not 100% convinced that they would be allowed to state the tub size as capacity. You could be right though.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chico, California
    Posts
    998
    Seems like our 'new' front loader has a lot less cu.ft. but a larger load wt. rating than the top loader we had. More clothes, less water and better spin. No agitator. We like it 'way more'.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Mpls, Minn
    Posts
    2,882
    3.2 cubic ft

    al
    Remember our vets, they need our help, just like they helped us.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Southwest VA
    Posts
    227
    heads up about the federal cash for clunkers appliance program which is supposed to take place in early november.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by David Freed View Post
    No. I agree with the hype, but I am not 100% convinced that they would be allowed to state the tub size as capacity. You could be right though.
    Even so David,

    Two issues I see.

    1: Buy the biggest that is available and do not worry about the comparative sizes. Would you not buy a new one if it was no bigger?

    2: Measure the tub of the biggest and the tub of your old one and pass those figures to the boss.

    I spent 2 years in the UK working with a major white goods manufacturer as part of a design team on an upright washing machine. The marketing types were trained to expand the truth.

    Ironically, this was to be the company's first upright as they had always made front loaders. And so the World turns.
    Dave J
    Forums: Where all too often, logic is the first casualty.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •