I've been reading all the scary threads about wood dust toxicity. Perhaps unfairly, I have assumed that these concerns arise primarily when using power tools. It seems obvious that scraping or planing a surface will produce less dust than using a powered (or even a hand-powered) sander, but I honestly do not know whether hand-sawing and hand-planing produces less dust than the electric versions of those same operations (in the latter case using a jointer/planer. As stated above, it's got to be better than sanding.)
I sort of assumed the galoot tasks make less scary dust, but I'm not sure why. Because there is less overall cutting and planing? Because they aren't moving as quickly so fewer fibers are pulverized?
As I stated in a previous post, I'm new at this. I work in an attached garage. I haven't installed any dust-control measures other than a broom. I recently ripped a nominal 1" x 12" board to a nominal 1x4" width on the TS and I was surprised at how "smoky" the garage seemed to be. I smelled in all the right places and decided that it was probably just suspended wood dust.
(1) Would the same operation with a rip saw or frame saw/bow saw create the same amount of suspended dust?
(2) For this or other hand-tool operations, do you take any precautions against breathing wood dust?
I have an amusing mental picture of someone affixing a cyclone machine to a dust hood suspended over their planing or sawing bench. Despite the great potential for chindogu, I'd seriously like to know (a) whether more hand tools mean less lung damage, and (b) whether the same respiratory protections should be taken with a hand saw or hand plane.
Thanks in advance.