Originally Posted by
Richard Niemiec
Just to be clear, I don't have any problem with a business plan that requires "members" to subscribe for content, Northwind owns the url, the servers, etc. and can do whatever it pleases. But the value of this site is the contribution made by the members in terms of content (which, according to the TOS, becomes the property of Northwind), and by slowly chipping away access the business risk is the alienation of the true content providers. So if its going to be a pay for access site, then that should be fairly and clearly stated, and assume the risk that the "active" membership of 10k+ will start to dwindle along with the knowledge base of those willing to share their expertise, and you might kill the goose, so to speak. Just don't sprinkle water on my head and tell me its raining, that's the hypocrisy I'm speaking of.