Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Counterbore holes don't match standard plug sizes

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    126

    Counterbore holes don't match standard plug sizes

    I'm attaching ship-lapped beetle-kill pine siding to an old trailer, and have been counterboring the screw holes to be covered later by plugs cut from the same wood.

    I've been drilling, countersinking and counterboring all in one step with one of those quick-change bit sets (Makita, in this case). The counterbore bit I've been using is stamped with an "8" on the shank (#8, right?) and I'm driving #8 deck screws.

    I bought a plug cutter set last week and discovered the counterbored holes don't match the size of any of the cutters in the set. The 1/4" plug is too small, and the 3/8" plug is too big. I have hundreds of holes to plug, and I fear having to remove all the screws and redrill each hole.

    Anyone know what I'm doing wrong and/or how I might fix it?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    22,520
    Blog Entries
    1
    Bad time to find out, eh? I hate that ;-) Does Makita sell matching plug cutters? I couldn't find any. Metric, me thinks. Funny that they would be specific on the screw size and casual about the counterbore. Please let us know what you find out.
    "A hen is only an egg's way of making another egg".


    – Samuel Butler

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    10,333
    Maybe the 8 is millimeters? That's very close to 5/16".

    Lee Valley offers both 5/16" and 8 mm plug cutters..http://www.veritastools.com/products/Page.aspx?p=153

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    126

    Of course!

    Thanks Jamie and Glenn! I guess my head was stuck in Imperial. Never even considered that it would be metric. But you must be right! And thanks for the link to the LV cutters. I'll probably be ordering today. You've officially gotten me unstuck.
    Last edited by Chris Nolin; 07-27-2010 at 3:57 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Williamsburg,Va.
    Posts
    12,402
    No,your head is stuck in IMPERIAL.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    126
    I caught it just as you were typing your post, George. Thanks, though. I should really know better, as I often make fun of others' grammar mistakes (especially those of Bush 43). Now I'm guilty of the same. I'm not having a good day, I guess!

    http://grammartips.homestead.com/empirical.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •