Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27

Thread: Powermatic 209 planer

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    LA & SC neither one is Cali
    Posts
    9,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Heidrick View Post
    Chip, I have not yet been convinced to buy the byrd for my DC580 but I am NOT giving up my segmented infeed rollers for sure.

    Mike I think you and Chip pointed out something I use in the back of my head when considering planers. I see it like this, if you want to handle glue ups then a planer at least the size of your jointer but not oversized (would be a 15" 4 post for most) along with a drum sander makes perfect sense. However if you want to take advantage of the ability to reduce milling time by running 2 or 3 boards at one time then segmented rollers are something I would consider mandatory, though depending on your stock it may not be needed every time. Bottom line if time is money a wide 20+ inch planer with segmented rollers is GREAT, if it is a hobby and money is not an issue get what you want, but I would rather have a 15" planer and a drum sander with good capacity than a 20" planer alone if money dictates a one or the other senario.

  2. #17

    PM Planers

    Back in the 70's I bought a Belsaw 12 inch planer with a 5 HP Baldor motor and I think it cost me about $1200. It rivaled the Rockwell 13" I had at school. I did some moldings with it from time to time and used the ripsaw attachment once. I still have that planer although it sits mostly unused in the shop. I had a chance to pick up a brand new PM 201 22" planer for $2900 delivered and could not pass it up. It is an incredible 1300 pound machine. Well, I digress from the topic. My point is that I think the PM planers through 20" are based on that Belsaw design and it worked well for me.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    LA & SC neither one is Cali
    Posts
    9,447
    Quote Originally Posted by John Carlo View Post
    Back in the 70's I bought a Belsaw 12 inch planer with a 5 HP Baldor motor and I think it cost me about $1200. It rivaled the Rockwell 13" I had at school. I did some moldings with it from time to time and used the ripsaw attachment once. I still have that planer although it sits mostly unused in the shop. I had a chance to pick up a brand new PM 201 22" planer for $2900 delivered and could not pass it up. It is an incredible 1300 pound machine. Well, I digress from the topic. My point is that I think the PM planers through 20" are based on that Belsaw design and it worked well for me.

    The 201 is indeed based on the Belsaw but the 209 is based on a 4 post design, which I "think" was originally a Delta design. The 201 is a serious step up from the 209 and about twice the price with straight knives.

  4. #19

    So I had it backwards!

    Thanks for setting it straight Van. Mine is an older model with the 4 straight knives. It does a great job on almost anything. I had to plane some bird's eye maple for a friend once and I wish I had the new 201 HH with the helical head for that.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Port Orchard WA
    Posts
    435
    I would love to have the segmented infeed rollers, but that in combo with a helical head would be over the top for me. When I plane multiple pieces they are all batch run, so they are sometimes actually the same thickness! Usually they will run through a planer together.
    The most economical 20" planer I can locate is the Griz G0454 along with a Byrd head for $2404 shipped (plus tax for me). Its actually less expensive to get the straight blade model, together with the Byrd head, than the G0454Z which is using he griz stepped helical head ($2469+tx)
    I am thinking that unless I stumble upon a great second hand deal around Seattle (and I might) I would be hard pressed to beat a 20" Byrd Shelix head planer for $2600 to my door. Upon Vans suggestion I did check out what a Jet 22/44 OS sander was going for and at $1699 its probably a great deal. Would be a great combo for me if I can swing it as I could use the 44" for my passage doors project.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Courtenay BC Canada
    Posts
    2,750
    I have the General Int 20" Planer which is likely the same machine with green paint. Miine has the helical cutterhead.

    I have planed full 20" wide glue-up's in Sapelli, Maple, Oak and Wenge. (some might have been 19")..

    The 5Hp motor is more than enough.. I have never even heard a moan..

    The helical head is worth every penny.. I recently put fresh knives in the head because they where dull.. I plane lots of glue-up's and the glue dulls the knives.. That's life.. With sharp knives, its amazing, even dull its better than the old straight knife 15" I had.

    The lack of segmented infeed roller is a pain.. Really annoying to try to plane a load of 1x3, but for a hobby.. I guess that's life too.

    Dust collection is very good. I run a 6" system with 6" flex hose reduced to the 5" intake on the planer.. Works like a charm.

    Built in casters make it a breeze to move. I think its an 800lb machine, so its important to me.

    I have a 12" Jointer.. I have to say that for the type of work I do, the planer being wider than 12" is a major bonus.. I sometimes wish the jointer was wider too.. but again.. that's life

    These are the annoyances..

    When the carbide is dull, they get chipped. Removing the cover to replace one knive ( or turn it) means removing the dust chute and the cover.. not a big deal, but there are better designs out there.

    There is a dead zone on the far edges of the cutterhead.. meaning you can get an unplaned lip on a really wide panel.. so you have to be careful.. or remove it with a block plane.. ( get your violin out on that one )

    Lack of segmented infeed roller

    When the blades are not sharp, boards tend to suddenly stop.. meaning I have to give them a shove to get them moving again.. Dual outfeed rollers that are powered would help here..

    Snipe.. I get a noticable snipe.. Again, powered, dual outfeed rollers would be superior to bed rollers.. (all the $20,000 planers have them )

    Not an impressive list of complaints.. Its a planer that costs much less than $5000.00 and as such, it doesnt have the niceties of the big Euro Machines.. but bang for the buck.. its a great machine.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Port Orchard WA
    Posts
    435
    Is there much of a difference between the helical heads that are available. The head on my 12" jointer is a stepped helical (Grizzly). It cuts smooth and holds a decent edge. Does the Byrd, which is a "true" helical, being that the blades are taking a skewed cut, any better, either cut smoothness wise, or in being able to hold an edge longer?
    How about the actual continuous spiral bladed heads that are out there?

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Camas, Wa
    Posts
    3,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Spool View Post
    Is there much of a difference between the helical heads that are available. The head on my 12" jointer is a stepped helical (Grizzly). It cuts smooth and holds a decent edge. Does the Byrd, which is a "true" helical, being that the blades are taking a skewed cut, any better, either cut smoothness wise, or in being able to hold an edge longer?
    How about the actual continuous spiral bladed heads that are out there?
    I have a Byrd in my 8" jointer and the Grizzly head in my G0453Z planer. I don't see a difference in cut quality. I have seen many threads on this and this is a general concensus. Shiraz Balolia(the owner of Grizzly) has stated here at the Creek that he has used both and has not seen a difference.

    I have never used the continuous spiral blade, but I have avoided them for several reasons. They are expensive and dsposiable so they are made not to be sharpened.. They don't look like they can be shifted when they get knicked. Since they are flexible, I would guess they they are not that durable. These are just speculations and maybe somebody can confirm.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    LA & SC neither one is Cali
    Posts
    9,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Spool View Post
    Is there much of a difference between the helical heads that are available. The head on my 12" jointer is a stepped helical (Grizzly). It cuts smooth and holds a decent edge. Does the Byrd, which is a "true" helical, being that the blades are taking a skewed cut, any better, either cut smoothness wise, or in being able to hold an edge longer?
    How about the actual continuous spiral bladed heads that are out there?
    As Cary said there doesn't seem to be a difference. The only "difference" I see is the Byrd is American made if that makes a difference to you. If I was buying one seperate from a machine the price difference is so close I would get the Byrd, if nothing else for the American factor.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Port Orchard WA
    Posts
    435
    Cary,
    Can you make any comment regarding the edge holding quality of the the two?

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Camas, Wa
    Posts
    3,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Spool View Post
    Cary,
    Can you make any comment regarding the edge holding quality of the the two?
    Not really. The jointer with the Byrd has been in use for a couple of years of light use. I have not flipped the cutters yet. I have only had the Grizzly planer for a couple months and has seen very little use to this point.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Courtenay BC Canada
    Posts
    2,750
    Most of the actual knives are made by Tigra, which is a German Carbide tooling company. I believe that the Byrd, Grizzly and Magnum all use Tigra cutters.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •