Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24

Thread: Your opinion on a work bench: How thick is too thick?

  1. #16
    bahh.. i was just about to say the same thing that jason said, but he beat me to it.

    I wouldn't go thicker than 4" because hold fasts wouldn't work well, and because the wait doesn't offer a practical benefit above that. It is still nice sometimes to be able to move the bench a little. A 650 pound bench doesn't have anything over a properly made 300 pound bench when planing something, nor when chiseling, etc.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    2,854
    Jim - To be effective as a workbench top, the width of the ripped, edged and planed boards doesn't have to be all one piece. In other words, if you decided on a 3" thick top, two 5-1/4" wide maple boards can be edge-joined to make a panel 10-1/2" wide, which can then be ripped down to 3 3" wide "boards" that can then be face-glued to form your workbench top. Yes, one of those 3" wide boards will be a composite of 2 boards, but it won't matter - the top will still move as one unit, and as long as you don't put one of the composite boards on either of the two outside workbench top edges, no one will ever be the wiser.

    The one caveat is that I would orient the "composite" laminates so that the wider piece is on the top face of the workbench - one would not, for example, want one of these joints within 1/4" of the workbench surface, as occasional re-flattening of the bench would eventually get down to the glue joint.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Posts
    1,617
    Excellant point, David.. With one side of the "scrap" ripped straight, one more pass through the saw and poof... edge-join material. A good way to "warm up" for the big glue-up anyway. :-)

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Corpus Christi, TX
    Posts
    6
    Thick enough so that you don't need a skirt. Clamp work better without a skirt.
    John

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Posts
    1,617
    No skirt??? ..even with shapely legs???? <cheezy grin>

  6. #21
    Too thick is only when you don't need legs under the bench. But 3 inches seems like the thickness of my next bench.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    Posts
    1,550
    Don't forget to take into account the vise when designing your benchtop. If it is too thick, you may be forced to rout out a significant amount of wood to accommodate the vise mechanism.

    Stan

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Williamsburg,Va.
    Posts
    12,402
    If the bench needs to be 32" high,and the top is 33" thick,then it is too thick.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Posts
    1,617
    I dunno.. just take a think shave off the top... <g>

    Not only that, little fear of sand-through!!

    Tho there is one thing... 33" x 36"w x 84"l is about 700bf of wood...

    Quote Originally Posted by george wilson View Post
    If the bench needs to be 32" high,and the top is 33" thick,then it is too thick.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •