Originally Posted by
mike lucas
I sure wouldn't trust anything Wood magazine ever reports!
It's not like they are a trusted company when it comes to showing the real winner. They show a huge bias just as you or I would. On top of that, they take dollars from these companies, making any test, an opinion. I will never trust any of these magazines to pick where my monies go!
I don't understand why you want Wood to do a test too compare the two.
I've heard this a number of times but have yet to see any proof of it. Care to share any proof?
Brian Austin
Phoenix, AZ
"Rule One: Well, I won't get it done sittin' here drinking coffee.
Rule Two: The best you can do is the best you can do, so don't panic."
-- John Gierach