I would like to hear a comparison between sublimation and direct substrate printing. I am sure a comparison between the two methods would be of interest to several folks.
It seems to me that direct substrate printing would be less work, more efficient and less expensive than sublimation. Given that with sublimation, generally, you must use certain coated substrates, heat setting of images, certain (expensive) inks, etc, whereas with direct substrate printing you may not have the same restrictions. Or am I all wet here?
Can anyone with experience in both arenas provide a comparison between the two methods - and, given a choice, which method would you choose if you had to start again?
Thanks, Pete