I just bought a Kreg 2000 and tried it out for the first time this weekend. The project was really simple--a square, four-sided stand, about 23" x 28", but only 7" high on the long sides and 8" high on the short sides. I wanted the pocket holes on the inside, but that prevented me from using my clamping squares to set the sides at 90 degrees during assembly--the sides were so narrow that I couldn't find a way to attach the squares without blocking the pocket holes. And the difference in height between the adjacent sides also created some challenges when I tried to think of alternative ways of squaring and clamping the parts. My clamping strategy failed, and the parts shifted when I drove the screws.
Perhaps the narrowness of the sides, their length, and the need to locate the pocket holes on the inside all combined to make this particular project poorly suited for pocket holes? I dunno. Now that I've thought about it some more, I think I could have held the parts in place, and kept them at 90 degrees, by making one or more specialized jigs. But the time and materials required to do so would not have been worth it, given the alternatives.
For example, biscuit joints would have been faster and easier to assemble accurately. Floating tenon joints made on my router jig may have taken a little longer, but it would have been close. They would definitely have been easier to assemble accurately. And if I'd been willing to locate the holes on the outside of the piece, it would have been much faster and easier to simply drive some 2" coarse-threaded screws into the ends, even taking into account the need to counterbore and plug the holes. All because of the difficulty of clamping the pieces when using pocket holes.
Before I bought the Kreg jig, I searched a lot of forums to find peoples' opinions, and they were all positive. I've rarely seen any product that seems to have earned such satisfaction among its customers. So what am I missing? Thanks in advance for your comments and advice.