Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Craftsman Style Bed

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Southeastern CT
    Posts
    141

    Craftsman Style Bed

    So the wife was surfing around the interwebs and found this bed, and wants me to build one similar to it.

    Attachment 251388

    So it will be made out of QWSO, assuming I can find a local source of 16/4 for the posts. I guess my main question would be if the mullions should just be applied over a plywood back to simulate the look, or would I be better off going the more complex route of structural mullions and individual panels?

    Additionally, the side rails connecting the headboard to the footboard will need to be wider so that they can keep our two twin sleep number mattresses from separating.

    I have been trying to learn SU, but I don't really have the time to devote to it, so I am sticking to pencil, paper, and scale for now.

    I appreciate any help,

    Mike

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Southeastern CT
    Posts
    141
    So how do I get the attachment to embed in my posts?

  3. #3
    What is the attachment and where does it reside currently?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Southeastern CT
    Posts
    141
    The attachment is a photo of the bed she wants (I uploaded the photo to SMC and then attached in my original post).

  5. #5
    Strange that it doesn't show. It's hard to answer your question but as a guess, I would be inclined to use a single plywood panel instead of a bunch of small panels and narrow frame members just to add some rigidity to the head and foot boards. I might change my mind after seeing the image.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Southeastern CT
    Posts
    141
    Hosted it over on photobucket:


  7. #7
    That'll do.

    Three panels on the headboard, two at the foot ought to work fine.

    If you had the time, this would be a good project to use to learn SketchUp but maybe the next one.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Southeastern CT
    Posts
    141
    Thanks Dave, I appreciate the feedback. 3 panels and applied mullions would certainly make the project easier, and should be more structurally sound. Waiting on a call back from the local specialty lumber store to see if they can get 16/4 QWSO.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Napa Valley, CA
    Posts
    916
    I agree with Dave: 3 panels with applied muntins.

    You don't have to find 16/4 stock for the legs. You can glue-up smaller boards and make things BETTER: with solid 16/4, you'll get--at best--two sides quater-sawn and two sides flat-sawn. You could glue-up from smaller stock and get all four sides quarter-sawn:

    4 inch post 1-15-13.png

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Southeastern CT
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Miner View Post
    I agree with Dave: 3 panels with applied muntins.

    You don't have to find 16/4 stock for the legs. You can glue-up smaller boards and make things BETTER: with solid 16/4, you'll get--at best--two sides quater-sawn and two sides flat-sawn. You could glue-up from smaller stock and get all four sides quarter-sawn:

    4 inch post 1-15-13.png
    Good point Jerry, I hadn't thought of that. Would take some pretty good precision to ensure the axial miters are exact, but should be to be done.

    Should make the lumber cost a little less as well. Maybe 6/4 for the sub-parts for the posts?

    I am looking for some help on sizing the rest of the pieces. For the topmost rail I was thinking 6/4 x 4", and the same for the bottom rail. For the rest I was thinking 3/4 x 2 1/2". I wanted to give the top and bottom rails some heft to carry the size of the posts into the rest of the design, and then 3/4" x 2 1/2" for the rest so it doesn't look overly chunky?

    What do you all think?

    Thanks,

    Mike
    Last edited by Mike Hollis; 01-17-2013 at 9:04 PM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Napa Valley, CA
    Posts
    916
    Mike--

    Here's another option for gluing up your legs--no mitering involved:

    Post Alternative 1-17-13.png

    As to sizing the parts: I think you're on the right track. Sketch-up is really useful here---it's easy to re-size the pieces and see what the results are before you actually build.

    Post parts could be 4/4 if you want, 6/4 would work also, and provide more glue surface in the miter if you go that way.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Southeastern CT
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Miner View Post
    Through tenons would look fine, IMHO, but unless you are building this in the room where it will live forever, don't you want to be able to dis-assemble for transport? (Can you get that thing through a bedroom door?) Maybe think about bed bolts or bed rail brackets so the headboard and footboard can be disconnected from the side rails.
    Good point about disassembly Jerry. I can always make faux through tenons for appearances.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    101
    Another even easier alternative for the legs is the lapped-miter router bit set sold by Infinity. I have one and use it with excellent results for just this purpose. It's expensive, and really falls into the category of "I just want to get this done so throw $$$ at the problem", but is a one time investment.

    http://www.infinitytools.com/1_2-Sha...ctinfo/55-505/
    Last edited by Chad Bender; 01-29-2013 at 3:16 PM. Reason: typo, added link

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •