After reading the posts, its clear that there are many ways to skin the cat which is a good thing.
First of all, I have to say that I do tails two ways. For kitchen drawer use and quick knock out jobs, I use the D-4 jig. When it really counts, I do them by hand with chisels, marking gages, and so on.
When you first begin to do these, you often start with the router based solutions. The focus is just to get something to work and not understanding the why of why it works. This makes setting up jigs a bit difficult and subject to trail and error. Just remember that there are two major solutions to keep straight. Through Tails and Lapped or Half Blind Tails. They are way different when using a router.
The first major problem you will encounter is the half pin placement dilema. Any of your fixed spacing jigs such as a keller or standard porter cable omnijig, etc. will have issues here. Your work may not be an integral multiple of the spacing of your particular jig. This means that you have to design your item with regard to the jig or your half pin placement will be wrong. So variable pin placement is vital.
The next item is the number of tails your using. You can always tell if a dodds tailer was at work because the drawer side is plum loaded with rough fitting dovetails based on its spindle spacing. On fine furniture, that is a sure turn off to any woodworking person. Your tails should be much larger than those done by a machine. So adjustability of tail width is vital.
Very fine antique furniture not only has large prominent tails, but they are often non-symetrical. A typical drawer will have 2 to 4 tails depending on size. If I need to hide a drawer bottom dado groove, the ability to readjust the lower tail is a good thing.
On high quality drawers, the drawer frequently has four sides and not five. This means that the drawer front has to be done accurately and that it contains the lap tails or half blind tails of the drawer. Doing it this way is much harder and often forces you to use half blinds on the front and through tails on the back.
But when using router jigs to make tails, you learn that the two sets of tails, half blind and through, use different tail angles. The finger angle on those fingers on your Leigh D-4 are no accident. They are designed for the typical through angle. So now, you have one angle at the front and another angle at the back. Those of us who like things simple and neat have an issue with this.
The reason there are so many different angle dovetail bits today is simple. In the half blind example, the router jig, the router and the dovetail bit are solving an equation literally. Because of how the jig is built and the fingers position in the half blind mode, there is only one solution for each major thickness. Even if you use slightly different thicknesses of stock, your depth of cut is fixed. You cannot selectively choose the depth of your half blind socket. That has been choosen for you by virtue of the bit your using. Move it up or down and you change your fit by changing the solution to this equation. And if your stock gets significantly thicker, you need to sink the socket deeper. You do this by changing your bit. You select one that has a deeper depth of cut but you also change your tail angle.
Most jigs are also limited to the size of tails they can cut. So its harder to cut those hunkin tails found in heavy timbers such as the skirt boards on a work bench.
Another flaw to jigs is the needle pin. Needle pins were used heavily in 18th century furniture both here and in england. A router jig cannot cut a needle pin because the support neck of the bit is to thick. Often, its only thick enough to allow a back saw to get into there. So most jigs can only cut half of this application... you get to cut the other half.
How about multi pins or hounds teeth. If these are through tails, then its possible to set up and cut these in two different setups. I have never done this on the Leigh D-4, but in theory, I think it can be done. As long as your tail angle remains the same which in a through application is a valid assumption.
So there are dozens of variations to the dovetail joint. Due entirely to laziness and speed, I have began using the Leigh D-4. But I am not at all proud of this. The reason I chose the D-4 was because I can set it up in such a way as to best mimick hand cut dovetails in the first place. If your doing lots of kitchen work, then the D-4 is a great way of knocking off a lot of drawers in a hurry.
But if I am doing it for myself, then I do it by hand. In fact, I hand dovetail both wood and metal. Metal is actually much easier to dovetail than wood because it is so forgiving. The metal tails are splayed both ways. This is done by cutting one set loose and straight. On assembly, you smash these loose and straights with a hammer in a process called peening. It mashes the metal into the nooks and crannies making the joint virtally invisable if your using the same metal for both sides. Its cooler than heck when you see brass and steel dovetailed together. Again, the angles for this are different than those used for wood.
That brings me to my last complaint about routing tails. Why do we need so many different dovetail bits with different angles? You dont. For wood, the old rule is this. For softwoods, use a 1:6 slope. For hardwoods, use a 1:8 slope. This applies if your doing through tails or blind tails. There is no equation solving by a super router computer gizmo here. Basic. Simple. Easy to remember. But it takes time to do dozens of drawers. And as i said, if its super high end or if its for me, I do it by hand. If its for a general customer in a kitchen, I use the Liegh D-4.
Had the dog not stopped to go to the bathroom, he would have caught the rabbit.