Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: Larger Harbor Freight Impeller

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Posts
    1,617
    Bryan,

    The jet engines you built weren't designed to swallow blocks of wood, screws and other things that might be inhaled by a DC, so it's a tradeoff. I do agree that the manufacturers have probably gone overboard, trading efficiency to ensure they aren't getting warranty repairs due to damaged impellers on a regular basis.
    One can never have too many planes and chisels... or so I'm learning!!

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Doylestown, PA
    Posts
    7,577
    An aspect of dust collection I'd never considered until Vaughn's post is the effect of altitude. Atmospheric pressure/density decreases faster than we flatlanders realize.

  3. #18
    I am having a difficult time comprehending the idea of reversing the motor rotation. It seems to me that reversing the rotation is counter productive unless you also reverse the "directionality" of the output port. As it sits, the air moves clockwise and exits with the port in the path of the air. If the motor rotates counter-clockwise, the air is moving counter-clockwise and has to reverse course 180 degrees in order to get out of the box. I suppose an argument could be made for a mod that would only require a 90 degree change in direction, but I simply don't understand, and I want to understand. Could someone who advocates that concept explain to me how that would work?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    1,544
    You have to do both, swap sides with the fan and wheel, and spin the motor the opposite way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •