Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Are 2" wide face frames too wide?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    7,033

    Are 2" wide face frames too wide?

    The plans I have for making a 36" cabinet call for a 2" wide face frame.
    I'm thinking that's a bit on the wide side and would look odd.

    If I alter the width and make them 1.75" instead am I going to run into problems with the drawers and the full overlay doors?
    "Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." - John Lennon

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamstown,ma
    Posts
    996
    Depends, if just flat stock, then yes too wide. If ,on the other hand your doing beaded face frames, 2" is my standard go to size. Also, on the flat you should factor in if there is any overlay, and how it impacts the look. On flat face frames I have been using 1 1/2" stock for 20-25 years and it works well.
    Peter

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    1,740
    Also figure out what type of hinges you are going to use. If your using ones that wrap around the face frame they come different sizes depending on how much overlap you are planning for.

    This sounds trivial but important once the cabinet is built and the hinges you bought wont work.
    Don

  4. #4
    Here is a picture of a cabinet I built with 2" face frame stock.
    IMG_20130320_091439.jpgIMG_20130320_091430.jpg

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    22,513
    Blog Entries
    1
    These are 36" wide, 2" frame on the left, 1-3/4" frame on the right:

    compare.jpg

    SketchUp is your friend.
    "A hen is only an egg's way of making another egg".


    – Samuel Butler

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Beantown
    Posts
    2,831
    Go with what you like the look of. To me 2" is too wide, especially if it's flat, not to mention if your doing full overlay it does not really provide any real benefit. In actuality it only uses more wood while making the cabinet less useful!

    I use different size stiles for different projects but for inset my typical is 1-1/2" for the verticals, with wider on the horizontals.


    good luck,
    JeffD

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Upland CA
    Posts
    5,565
    I always use 2" face frames, unless it is going to be a small cabinet. The overlay doors will reduce the visual size anyway. My raised panel doors are usually 2 3/8", which when used with cope and stick cutters makes the visual width 2".

    Rick Potter

    PS: When in doubt, I use some old plywood strips and make a real quick face frame, so I can visualize it better.

  8. #8
    depends on the hinges you are using if using euro hinges 2" minimum and then you will probably cut into the dado of the door a bit for euro i use a 2 1/4 " frame

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Highland MI
    Posts
    4,524
    Blog Entries
    11
    Funny how just a quarter inch in width of the frame can make a significant difference in the look of the piece.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    6,426
    I generally use 2" stiles and top rail, and 2-1/2" bottom rail. EIther flat or raised panels, depending.

    My stuff is typically in the Arts + Crafts genre....and those frequently have "beefy" design cues.

    Walnut + QS Sycamore blanket chest. Center rails are 2", legs 3", long rails on top are 2-1/2", end rails are bigger than that to allow for the curve.



    June 4 Misc 01.jpgJune 4 Misc 07.jpg
    When I started woodworking, I didn't know squat. I have progressed in 30 years - now I do know squat.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Islesboro, Maine
    Posts
    1,268
    I think it depends on what look your looking for. If you have over lay doors or inset doors. I make most of my cabinet sides from 3/4'' birch plywood. When you have two boxes side by side that only leaves you with a 1/4'' on either side of the 2" face frame on the inside of the cabinet. I like a little more space than that so I might go with a 2 1/2'' FF...All depends what look your looking for....

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    7,033
    Funny how just a quarter inch in width of the frame can make a significant difference in the look of the piece.
    Ain't that the truth!

    Like my bro Kent mentioned, A&C and/or Mission has a "beefy" look where 2" or better - is what looks good.
    But - you put 2" on Shaker stuff and it looks horrid.
    Even 1.75" on Shaker is pushing it. (IMHO)

    This particular piece I'm looking to make is in a sort of Contemporary limbo....where 2" could go either way.
    The plans call for full overlay doors so I should be ok w/2" face frames.
    "Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." - John Lennon

  13. #13
    I just made 35 cabinet doors. All have 2" wide rails and stiles. They range in width from 11-1/2" to 20-1/2". Here's a sampling. Judge for yourself.


    Door widths:
    Top from left top right: 13", 13", 14-1/2", 14-1/2"
    Bottom from left to right: 17-1/2", 17-1/2", 20-1/2"

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Great Falls, VA
    Posts
    813
    My view is it depends very much on how the rails and stiles are profiled and joined, and to some extent on how the center panels are constructed. E.g., if you are using 4/4 stock milled to 3/4", with a full ogee on the outer edges of the frame, and a cope-and-stick cutter to form a small quarter-round along the inside edges and to cut the joints, then a 2" width will look quite balanced, even on narrow cabinet doors. If you are not profiling the rails and stiles at all (leaving them flat and square, or maybe with a modest round-over), it can look too wide. If the center panels are raised and floating, this, to my eye, calls even more for 2" or 2-1/8"-wide, profiled rails and stiles.

    That said, if the rails and stiles are to be profiled on a router table using small router bits, instead of on a full-sized shaper or with large router bits, I can see how that would call for 1-1/2" or 1-3/4" rails and stiles, as the finished relief would likely be less pronounced.

    David

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Niagara, Ontario
    Posts
    657
    I'm not sure the OP has doubts about the width of rails and stiles. 2 inches seems like somewhere between the sweet spot and narrow-ish.

    Now, 2" face frames seem like much to me.
    To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •