IS Ml Cambell available at Sherman Williams?
Corey
The water soluble aniline dyes that Jim mentions are a whole different ballgame, and a vastly superior and more predictable and controllable way to add color to wood. They add color without surface pigment, and the water doesn't seal the wood to prevent adding more color if you want it.
Oil finishes can be used over the dye, because although water and oil don't mix, the water evaporates.
Its easy to keep the end grain from getting too dark by applying a little water to it before the dye.
The dye can be strengthened or diluted by adding more powder or more water after you've made up a batch, which makes it easy to do trials on wood samples.
The only downside I know of is that the water will raise the grain slightly, and so the work needs an extra very light sanding. This can be done by wetting the surface before dyeing, then sanding, or sanding after dyeing, which has to be done more carefully to avoid sanding through the dyed layer of wood.
Something to watch out for is that if another coat is applied after the dye dries, the color is additive, so you need to be sure not to have isolated runs anywhere on the workpiece or you may not be able to blend them out. It's been a long time since I used it, but after learning my lesson the hard way I made sure I covered all surfaces, top and bottom, at the same time.
This assumes, of course, that your 'professional finisher's supply house' isn't a Sherwin Williams store. If it is, save yourself a stop and go on to the next place.Originally Posted by Todd Burch
Well...I'm glad to hear that Minwax sucks. All this time, I thought I sucked!
Guess I'll start looking into something else. Thanks for the post Todd.
~john
"There's nothing wrong with Quiet" ` Jeremiah Johnson
Corey, no, you can't get ML Campbell products at a Sherwin William's Store. Go figure. Wish you could, 'cuz I have two SW stores within 5 miles of a my house, and my nearest ML Campbell supplier is a 1/2 day trip into Houston and back if there is any kind of traffic. Of course, they deliver for free if I order enough at once.
Todd
Minwax is about all I use. Never had a problem. Hmmm
I used to use, and still on occasion, Valspar stain. But gave up on it, as after it was once opened up, a month later it was dried up in the can.
I do not understand.
Steve
Been reading this thread and do have an issue with SW, basically that I find a product from them and then they cancel it. And they are doing it again with their DeckScapes, oil base which I use for my cedar outdoor projects.
In any event, just got the FWW Aug, 2005 issue and they, guess what, rated the 2 minwax tested (Minwax Wipe-On Poly and Fast-Drying Polyurethane Varnish) the best out of 16 brands/types tested. I did stop by my local SW today and the guy I talk to said that minwax was really not too good and their "Wood Classics" is a much better product (50% more expensive?).
I was not impressed by some of the criteria that the guy used to determine good/bad but a couple of them were "water resistance" and "Sheen" and the products tested consisted products that contained poly and no poly and a combination of other things --- sort of a stupid test. I know that I use Watco (natural danish oil) followed up by briwax. There is a big difference in the water resistance and scheen between the wax and no wax.
This kind of reminds me of the Wood Magazine last year on glue and them rating Titebond real low. A couple of months later they rated the different Tilebond glues the highest (they screwed up but of course, did not omit to it).
Regards, Joe
P.S., Worst performer of the group was Tried and True Varnish Oil and the ugly award goes to Hydrocote Danish Oil.
Two weeks, your project will be done in two weeks!!! (From the Money Pit)
Fine Woodworking rates Minwax wipe on poly as a best value and best overall. The article does not address the underlying stain qualities.
joseph.."I did stop by my local SW today and the guy I talk to said that minwax was really not too good and their "Wood Classics" is a much better product (50% more expensive?)."
ive used wood classics twice. hated both times but had to on the second time because its thicker and it was for whitewashing/pickling. it did give me more control and color than miniwax versions but now wood classics truely "sucks". more expensive product and a heck of a lot more work for "no gain" in appearance.
now ill take S&W clear coatings,paints and other products they sell but the can keep there "wood classics stains".....jack
I can't help but suspect that the rating system is based on the "average user" and "ease of use" criteria. I've been using minwax products for years for a variety of things and felt that they were filling the bill just fine. Not spectacular...just sufficient. Other "non-woodworking" folks actually rave about the products. Since taking the advice of many people on SMC, I've found much better finishes. The difference in the final product is the difference between a plastic shine and a fine craftsman finish.
Over the years, I think folks have lost sight of what craftsmanship is all about and minwax and SW are capitalizing on that ignorance. IMHO
~john
"There's nothing wrong with Quiet" ` Jeremiah Johnson
I had to chuckle when I read the FWW article last night, but I have used the top-rated Minwax wipe on Poly and it worked as advertized. It was also interesting to see how light in color it is as compared to others. Give I rarely use Polyurethanes, I would buy this product again if I needed some poly simply because it's readily available and inexpensive. (My one complaint with the review was he only did three applications...wipe on is often done with a dozen or more coats) I also have to say I agree about the T&T Varnish Oil...I never liked it one bit, yet I love the other two formulations.
But as someone else pointed out a few posts back...the original premise of this thread was around the Minwax stain products...
--
The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...
"Over the years, I think folks have lost sight of what craftsmanship is all about and minwax and SW are capitalizing on that ignorance."
not really, just alot of us professionals taking advantage of the newer products at hand. just a new age of woodworking....jack
I hate finishing almost as much as I hate sharpening. I'd rather pay other people to do those things and spend my time making furniture.
The frustrating thing for me is that not only is Minwax everywhere, there are no alternatives in town. And some of the Minwax colors are downright impossible to find. A current project appeared to need a color called "driftwood", based on the brochure. I went to everywhere I could think of in town and only found one small can. Messing around with it, I found it wasn't the color I needed anyway (not dark enough), but one coat of driftwood and another of a minwax gelstain (can't remember the color) actually gets me in the ballpark for the color I am looking for (trying to match existing shelves). Problem is, I need more driftwood!
I used a wood conditioner with decent but not great results on birch plywood with maple edging. I might try one side without the conditioner to get a darker color. The original shelves are pretty blotchy anyway.
Bb
I am also clearly in the minority since I do on occasion use Minwax stains and get very good results. Mostly I use dyes by Trans Tint mixed with shellac to achieve my color objectives which I fine to be the only solution that works consistently on maple. But, sometimes Minwax is just what I need and seems to be a satisfactory product. Can't help but wonder if poeple would like it better if it was hard to get. I sometimes get the feeling that we equate quality and desireability with rareity and cost...
Chris