I'm wondering at what point is it better to just rent a house? I have my house on the market. The problem is trying to find a replacement house that I can afford and doesn't need major repair. Most of the houses in my price range will need a new furnace and air conditioner probably within five years and the windows and siding usually will need replacement at some point. Good windows and siding can easily cost $50,000 and then another $10,000 possibly for a good furnace and air conditioner. (Yes, my parents spent $50,000 for really good windows and really good siding a few years back.)
I spend $1,880 a month for taxes, mortgage, and insurance for my current house. It almost seems like it would be better to just spend $1,500 a month on rent and let the landlord deal with all the expense of owning a house. I guess the disadvantage is most landlords will never upgrade the house and spend the least amount of money possible. On my house if something cosmetic breaks I fix it. A landlord would likely never fix cosmetic issues. Landlords would be likely to put in the cheapest least efficient furnace possible as the tenant has to pay the gas bill. There would be zero incentive for me to invest any of my labor and money on fixes to a rental home. Besides, the landlord wouldn't want the tenants making repairs.
My current house is worth $335,000 and the houses I have been looking at are between $150,000 and $250,000. I am really trying to be at $200,000.