Are blade lengths fairly standard on traditional (Stanley, MF, Sargent) bench planes? 7.5" long, with 2" of blade below the end of the slot?
- The slot on the almost new Stanley #4 I am measuring is slightly over 4.5"
- Adjusting the chip breaker even with the end of the blade uses the first inch (and gets just beyond the enlarged hole)
- If I have used up 100% (2") of the blade (for argument's sake), there is another 1.5" of slot that has never been used.
- So the slot could have been 1.5" shorter and he blade could have been 1.5" shorter (keeping the approx. 5/8" beyond the slot)
- That would be cheaper to manufacture
- The adjustment lever extends beyond the blade almost as soon as the blade gets shorter - it doesn't seem like that's much of a factor. Indeed, it might be more convenient.
Question: Why aren't the blades shorter?
What do others do?
- LN #4 blade - I don't have one (feel free to send me one - I'll be glad to pay postage, even from PERTH!)
- The blade is 9.5" long (per plane description)
- My rough measure of their graphic on the blade is that the cutting blade portion is about 3.2" and the slot is roughly 4.4"
- So LN doesn't have slot that's never used (I assume they, like Stanley, have the same "just over an inch" to get beyond the enlarged hole)
- Hock replacement blades are 7" long but they would seem to have at least 2" of usable blade - their web site didn't even list the length
I give up - I've gone beyond my attention span. And I think I've provided enough info for novices. And you pros probably could have answered my question even if my entire post was simply "Why aren't the blades shorter?"
Every time I learn something, I find at least one more thing I don't know.