Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Blade arbor - how worn is too worn?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Whidbey Island, WA
    Posts
    444

    Blade arbor - how worn is too worn?

    I recently got an Omga radial arm saw and have been going over it.

    The main question is regarding the motor: how undersized or worn can a motor spindle be before it causes issues spinning a blade? It is 1" spindle, spins a 12" blade, and uses a keyway due to having a mechanical brake. Omga tech tells me a new motor spindle measures .999" with digital calipers. My spindle measures around .992-.995" (.005-.008" under). For comparison, the 5/8" arbor on my Sawstop measures .6235" (.015" under) and the 5/8" to 1" arbor adapter on my Makita miter saw reads .9985" (also .015" under). There's noticeable more slop with a blade on the Omga than with a blade on the miter saw or table saw. But is it enough to worry about? I don't see the slop introducing blade wobble, with the massive blade washers there. I'll be using the radial arm saw for general crosscutting and I do want it to cut well. A new motor is $1300.

    IMG_1251.jpg
    IMG_1250.jpg
    Last edited by Jonathan Jung; 10-28-2022 at 2:05 PM.
    JonathanJungDesign.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,372
    Blog Entries
    3
    More radial runout will cause a larger out of balance scenario. It may cause enough increased vibration to be problematic.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    4,568
    Clearance of the blade hole and the arbor will not affect nut tightness. If that was an issue, every Harley motorcycle in the world would be laying in pieces on the highway. No wait......LOL Jared is right, only limits vibration.

  4. #4
    There is no reason why an arbor should wear like that. I would say that the previous owner/s didn't know what they were doing. It looks like the arbor was just sitting there spinning, and the blade wasn't, wtf

    Without even knowing the numbers, just looking at it, I would be concerned and probably replace it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Whidbey Island, WA
    Posts
    444
    It looks that a previous owner ran wide blades or dado stacks without the key, so every time the brake engaged to stop the spindle the blades spun a little. Also it doesn't have soft start. I'm guessing after thousands of starts and brakes the blades wore on the spindle. The saw is designed to be turned on, left on for an entire batch of parts, then turned up.
    JonathanJungDesign.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Western PA
    Posts
    1,247
    I had a pm72 with a worn arbor, and i only ever noticed it with running wide dado stacks. The bottom of my dadoes would have ever so slight discrepancies between the chippers. Going off a 3-4 year old memory, my arbor looked worse than your arbor. Never noticed any issues ripping or crosscutting with the saw, just the dadoes.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    3,093
    If your Sawstop measures .6235, then it is only 0.0015" under size.

  8. #8
    I would put your intended blade on the saw, make some cuts and see if you find the results acceptable.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    4,568
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Frank View Post
    If your Sawstop measures .6235, then it is only 0.0015" under size.
    Yup, he better get a calculator! If you demand pure precision, take it to a motor shop. They can build up the shaft with a laser or flame spray and then turn it back down. Spun a bearing on a Griggio slider once and the motor came back like new. Not cheap and not every motor shop has the capability.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,629
    I was a salesman for Chicago rawhide oil seals. We sold an item called a speedi sleeve to repair shafts from seal wear. You use metal filler and slide this on, once it sets up, new seal surface. Not sure if this would work here, but a shop could potentially weld it up and turn it down, I would think for less money.

  11. #11
    +1 on the shaft repair. That saw is too nice a machine to use with anything less than the original fabled precision.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in the Land of Lincoln
    Posts
    2,573
    Put a blade on and try it. You are talking .0025-.004 per side. I'm guessing you won't notice it especially since you only plan to cross cut with it. If the blade doesn't wobble side to side it shouldn't affect the cut quality. Compare smoothness when running without and with a blade mounted. Don't over think it unless it's necessary. Only if it causes an issue would I seek a solution.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Western Nebraska
    Posts
    4,680
    I let one of those get away on a local auction recently, still kicking myself. I doubt you will have runout problems. Where you put your dial caliper on that shaft will likely yield different results. You'll probably find that there are places that it actually reads in spec or slightly higher as the metal from galling didn't leave the shaft when the blade spun, it just moved it. You will probably find measuring the diameter runout of a blade, you get different results than just measuring the shaft. My guess is that you will find it's a non-issue in practical use, you might just have a cosmetic decision to make. Oh, good luck getting a blade that's +/- .001 for a solid test, you might have to try a few.

  14. #14
    Could you have the shaft plated to build it up?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Modesto, CA, USA
    Posts
    10,041
    You could do it with JB weld then sand it down. have a one inch bore shaper cutter to use as a a go/no go guage?
    Bill D

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •