Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: Dust Collector Performance Measurements

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Tippecanoe County, IN
    Posts
    836
    Alan, here's what I get when I plot your data:
    Fan Curve.jpg
    Current.jpg
    I left out the all closed data point, it looked a bit odd.
    Beranek's Law:

    It has been remarked that if one selects his own components, builds his own enclosure, and is convinced he has made a wise choice of design, then his own loudspeaker sounds better to him than does anyone else's loudspeaker. In this case, the frequency response of the loudspeaker seems to play only a minor part in forming a person's opinion.
    L.L. Beranek, Acoustics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954), p.208.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Phoenix AZ Area
    Posts
    2,505
    I didn't get the anemometer to determine the exact fan curve but rather to measure objectively relative changes. The engineer in me spent a couple of hours last reading and considering installing a pitot tube and gauges. Then I realized that I just need to measure to see in changes help or not.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central MA
    Posts
    1,592
    One piece of advice for anyone who is looking for test equipment is to keep an eye on eBay. I got my Dwyer hot-wire anemometer for under $100 in as new condition. There are still deals to be had if you're patient.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    240
    I took a little different approach to computing the CFM for my dust collection system. My dust collector is in a separate room adjacent to the shop with the air returning through a grate. The grate manufacturer publishes the pressure loss through the grate as a function of CFM. So I connected a magnehelic gauge to measure the static pressure difference across the return grate (between the room with the collector, and the shop), and then computed the overall system CFM based on the grate's loss curve from the manufacturer. A manometer would have worked instead of a magnehelic, but it just seemed easier for my eyes to read off the needle on the gauge.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    1,544
    A magnehellic setup to read static is ideal for monitoring changes. Connect one port to the duct and leave the other one open. A change in flow give a large change in static because the SP varies with the square of the flow change. You probably want at least a 0-10" gauge, depending on your collector and system.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •