Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 95

Thread: Who has $4222 to spend on a Smoother?

  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Hilton Ralphs View Post
    The new SE Dual Angle Smoother from Bridge City Tool Works.

    Not sure I even like it.

    Attachment 336941
    Wicked to look at, but I will stick to my vintage Stanley's...

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    twomiles from the "peak of Ohio
    Posts
    12,185
    It makes my hands hurt just looking at it. Hit a knot with it, and that scrawny knob will break.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Williamsburg,Va.
    Posts
    12,402
    I'm failing to see WHY their 6" rule is "Unlike any other on the market". Looks just like a PEC rule. Is it the 1/16" grads + the 1/32" grads? The hard chrome is pretty standard also.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Neither here nor there
    Posts
    3,841
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by george wilson View Post
    I'm failing to see WHY their 6" rule is "Unlike any other on the market". Looks just like a PEC rule. Is it the 1/16" grads + the 1/32" grads? The hard chrome is pretty standard also.
    No other 6" ruler says "Bridge City Toolworks, Portland, Oregon" on it. By default, their statement is accurate. I could say my Jeep Liberty is "unlike any other on the market" because no other Jeep Liberty has the same combination of sawdust, beach sand, and rust spots as mine.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by george wilson View Post
    I'm failing to see WHY their 6" rule is "Unlike any other on the market". Looks just like a PEC rule. Is it the 1/16" grads + the 1/32" grads? The hard chrome is pretty standard also.
    Since your post is in response to mine, I'd like to point out that the citation is taken from Bridge City's Website and not from my post.

    "Unlike any other on the market" seems to be no more than bog-standard copywriting these days. Although I have, regularly use, and happily recommend their 6" rule, I have not compared it to others nor done any kind of market round-up of the genre. The rule is accurate and precise, easy to read, provides a quick ¾" parallel, and has a handy 1/32's scale on the short ends that I often use for setting marking gauges.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Earth somewhere
    Posts
    1,061
    Wow. Tough crowd tonight. I applaud the makers and their effort. They have carved out a niche market and for all intensive purposes are succeeding. It shows an exceptional level of skill in manufacture, ingenuity and design - no one can question that. I would suspect you could hardly find a blemish on it. And thank, what ever you believe in, that you live in a part of the world where it's possible to at least be exposed to such freedoms. I would wonder if the plane is all that far off if you compared the ratio of wages to cost as to whether the plane is out of skew with what a Norris (or some other ground breaking plane was) cost 150 or 200 years ago...
    Sent from the bathtub on my Samsung Galaxy(C)S5 with waterproof Lifeproof Case(C), and spell check turned off!

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ashton View Post
    Wow. Tough crowd tonight. I applaud the makers and their effort. They have carved out a niche market and for all intensive purposes are succeeding. It shows an exceptional level of skill in manufacture, ingenuity and design - no one can question that. I would suspect you could hardly find a blemish on it. And thank, what ever you believe in, that you live in a part of the world where it's possible to at least be exposed to such freedoms. I would wonder if the plane is all that far off if you compared the ratio of wages to cost as to whether the plane is out of skew with what a Norris (or some other ground breaking plane was) cost 150 or 200 years ago...
    At least in my case the reason I'm being harsh isn't because it costs so much - it's because it's obviously impractical.

    Holtey planes cost double what the BC one does, and I would never pay that much for a simple fixture that holds a chisel at a fixed angle and adjustable projection, but they're also VERY respectable and usable planes. I don't think you can say that about the BC with its funky ergonomics, and that makes it purely a status symbol.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ashton View Post
    [ ... ] carved out a niche market [ ... ]
    Here in this forum, I think the apposite question is: What market?

    A market for tools?

    Or a market for collectibles?

    Those markets barely overlap.

    The success of a tool is that is adopted by tool-users and/or copied by other tool-makers. I don't see this happening to the Bridge City items such as the SE Dual-Angle Smoother.

    The success of a collectible is that it sells well. Note that the plane in question is being produced as a limited edition (a concept taken from fine-art printing, afaik). I do see the limited-edition SE Dual-Angle Smoother selling out its manufacturing run of 50 units:
    Only 50 of these exquisitely crafted tools wil be made and have a few units remaining. {sic.}

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,412
    Quote Originally Posted by george wilson View Post
    I'm failing to see WHY their 6" rule is "Unlike any other on the market". Looks just like a PEC rule. Is it the 1/16" grads + the 1/32" grads? The hard chrome is pretty standard also.
    Not to take this too OT, but what do you think of those PEC squares? Seem like a good value compared to Starrett, which I swear by.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Earth somewhere
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirby Krieger View Post
    Here in this forum, I think the apposite question is: What market?

    A market for tools?

    Or a market for collectibles?

    Those markets barely overlap.

    The success of a tool is that is adopted by tool-users and/or copied by other tool-makers. I don't see this happening to the Bridge City items such as the SE Dual-Angle Smoother.

    The success of a collectible is that it sells well. Note that the plane in question is being produced as a limited edition (a concept taken from fine-art printing, afaik). I do see the limited-edition SE Dual-Angle Smoother selling out its manufacturing run of 50 units:

    My metric for success is the accounting one - the business is an on going concern

    They've been around a long time and plan to continue for a long time so they are a success. Maybe they don't make a lot of money and their market is very narrow, but then again I've never met a well paid furniture maker that makes furniture for all aspects (no one makes furniture for the cheap ikea shopper. You know the one, the shopper that ask why your furniture is more expensive than ikeas) of the market - ever. Met plenty of happy and content woodworkers but not because of the pay.
    Last edited by Brian Ashton; 05-07-2016 at 11:58 PM.
    Sent from the bathtub on my Samsung Galaxy(C)S5 with waterproof Lifeproof Case(C), and spell check turned off!

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Earth somewhere
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Chase View Post
    At least in my case the reason I'm being harsh isn't because it costs so much - it's because it's obviously impractical.

    Holtey planes cost double what the BC one does, and I would never pay that much for a simple fixture that holds a chisel at a fixed angle and adjustable projection, but they're also VERY respectable and usable planes. I don't think you can say that about the BC with its funky ergonomics, and that makes it purely a status symbol.
    Maybe, but so what. Years ago I got to make a carved cup that would never ever be used for anything, it would only ever sit in a glass cabinet and the customer paid hundreds for it... They wanted it and they could afford it. Again I'm glad that I live in a part of the world where that's a choice.

    And to be honest, who's going to pay $7000 for a Hotley and used it in any practical manner. The best you could expect is they take one shaving off a pine board, take a picture to prove it, and then stick it in the show case, never to come out again. People buy Bugatti Vayrons but they don't drive down to the supermarket in them.

    I'm one of those who embraces class society. How else am I going to get to make ridiculously opulent crap that has no practical value, unless there are those that have obscene amounts of cash to throw about .
    Last edited by Brian Ashton; 05-08-2016 at 12:13 AM.
    Sent from the bathtub on my Samsung Galaxy(C)S5 with waterproof Lifeproof Case(C), and spell check turned off!

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,497
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Chase View Post
    At least in my case the reason I'm being harsh isn't because it costs so much - it's because it's obviously impractical.

    Holtey planes cost double what the BC one does, and I would never pay that much for a simple fixture that holds a chisel at a fixed angle and adjustable projection, but they're also VERY respectable and usable planes. I don't think you can say that about the BC with its funky ergonomics, and that makes it purely a status symbol.
    Patrick, I think that the BCT and Holtey are two different markets - although not to say that you cannot have those that like both. In my opinion, BCT build original designs, and they are aimed at the art-as-tools market. I think some of their designs are fabulous. But I do not take many as serious tools-first .... although, having written that, I must qualify that some are splendid tools. My one and only BCT tool is a 2x2 saddle square. That's it on the left alongside a dovetail market I built ...



    You will find unused BCT tools on eBay. There are many that collect them - again, as art, and not to use. I view John Economaki as a brilliant and inventive designer. If you and others do not share his ideas, then that simply reflects "art lies in the eye of the beholder". Agree or disagree, the man puts it out there.

    Karl Holtey is brilliant as well, but in a different way. He finally moved away from reproducing Norris designs, which nevertheless came with his improvements to the mechanics, to produce his own designs. And they are not only excellent, but taken to the highest level in construction. I think that he will always be remembered for his utmost precision, however, and not for his design work. As a contrast, Konrad Sauer will be recalled for his lines and flow.

    Regards from Perth

    Derek

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Earth somewhere
    Posts
    1,061
    One thing is for certain. If BCT doesn't continue after the founder hangs it up, those tools will be worth a fortune. In 200 years they will only be found in the most exclusive collections or museums... He will be remembered that's for sure
    Sent from the bathtub on my Samsung Galaxy(C)S5 with waterproof Lifeproof Case(C), and spell check turned off!

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ashton View Post
    People buy Bugatti Vayrons but they don't drive down to the supermarket in them.
    You would be surprised at some of the things people do with Buggati Veyrons.

    Full disclosure: Insurance fraud.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Cohen View Post
    Patrick, I think that the BCT and Holtey are two different markets - although not to say that you cannot have those that like both. In my opinion, BCT build original designs, and they are aimed at the art-as-tools market. I think some of their designs are fabulous. But I do not take many as serious tools-first .... although, having written that, I must qualify that some are splendid tools. My one and only BCT tool is a 2x2 saddle square. That's it on the left alongside a dovetail market I built ...
    To be honest I prefer the aesthetics of your dovetailed dovetail marker to those of the BCT saddle. More thoughts on that below...

    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Cohen View Post
    You will find unused BCT tools on eBay. There are many that collect them - again, as art, and not to use. I view John Economaki as a brilliant and inventive designer. If you and others do not share his ideas, then that simply reflects "art lies in the eye of the beholder". Agree or disagree, the man puts it out there.

    Karl Holtey is brilliant as well, but in a different way. He finally moved away from reproducing Norris designs, which nevertheless came with his improvements to the mechanics, to produce his own designs. And they are not only excellent, but taken to the highest level in construction. I think that he will always be remembered for his utmost precision, however, and not for his design work. As a contrast, Konrad Sauer will be recalled for his lines and flow.

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    I have a couple thoughts:

    1. I tend to evaluate tools on the basis of their usefulness as such rather than their aesthetics. That's probably why I have a soft spot for unattractive-but-efficient designs like the classic Veritas BD "East German Swimmer special" plane. It also means that I'm fundamentally unreceptive to "art that imitates tools" if it isn't useful as a tool, which I think validates your point about this discussion being mostly a matter of differing aesthetics.

    2. This is a woodworking forum, so I don't think it's unreasonable to evaluate tools based on their functionality.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •