Initial ruling was Bosch imposed on the SawStop patent. If so I hope they lose. Just because they have "deep" pockets they should not be allowed to copy an idea and not pay for it. Many resent the fact that Gass tried to make his technology mandatory on every saw, thus eliminating a choice. To me the PTI did the exact same thing saying that I didn't need and couldn't have this technology also eliminating my choice. Today I have a choice because Gass surprised the PTI by starting SawStop. I did buy the SawStop because I was able to choose if I wanted the technology or a lousy blade guard the PTI says is all I need.